Tuesday, January 16, 2018

PRJ Article Posted: The Ending of Mark as a Canonical Crisis


The article version of the paper I present last year at Houston Baptist University’s theology conference titled "The Ending of Mark as a Canonical Crisis" has just come out in the latest edition of Puritan Reformed Journal Vol. 10, No. 1 (January 2018): 31-54.

I have uploaded a pdf of my article to my page at academia.edu (look here). You can also find the pdf of the entire PRJ issue here or order a hard cop of the issue here. I also posted an abbreviated audio version of my paper presentation last year as WM 72 (see this blog post with link to audio here).

Here's the concluding paragraph of the article:

In our present day, this renewed challenge to the Traditional Ending of Mark has created a new canonical crisis. I believe it is reasonable and right to advocate for a new consensus to emerge which reaffirms the Traditional Ending of Mark as the authoritative, fitting, and canonical conclusion to Mark. Such a consensus would again provide consistent and authoritative translations to be read by God’s people both privately in personal devotion and publicly in corporate worship and would allow ministers to preach this text with confidence as the Word of God.

JTR

Monday, January 15, 2018

Calvin on unbelief (John 6:64a)


But there are some of you that believe not (John 6:64a).

I preached yesterday at CRBC on John 6:59-71. In reading Calvin’s commentary on the passage, I was struck by his analysis of John 6:64a:

….for unbelief, as it is always proud, will never understand any thing in the words of Christ, which it despises and disdains. Wherefore, if we wish to profit at all under this Teacher, let us bring minds well disposed to listen to him; for if the entrance to his doctrine be not opened by humility and reverence, our understandings are harder than stones, and will not receive any part of sound doctrine. And therefore, when in the present day we see so few people in the world profiting by the Gospel, we ought to remember that this arises from the depravity of men. For how many will you find who deny themselves, and truly submit to Christ? As to his saying only that there were SOME who did not believe, though almost all of them were liable to this charge, his reason for doing so appears to have been that, if there were any who were not yet beyond the possibility of cure, they might not cast down their minds in despair.


JTR

Saturday, January 13, 2018

WM 88: Polycarp of Smyrna


Image: A depiction of the martyrdom of Polycarp of Smyrna (69-155).

Note: I just posted WM 88: Polycarp of Smyrna (listen here).

Regarding Polycarp of Smyrna:

Polycarp was the bishop of Smyrna, an early center of Christianity in Asia Minor (see Rev 2:8-11). The dates for his life are traditionally set as AD 69-155. Eusebius, however, says he was put to death during the reign of the Roman Emperor Marcus Aurelius (161-180) which would move the dates for his life further back (see EH IV.XIV). As a younger man he had met with Ignatius of Antioch when Ignatius passed through Smyrna on his way to martyrdom in Rome (c. 107). One of Ignatius’ seven letters was directed to Polycarp.

In the report of his martyrdom he claims to have served Christ for 86 years. Does this mean he was 86 and had been baptized as an infant? Or was he saying that he had, in some way, been serving the Lord (even before his conversion)? Or had he perhaps been converted as, say, a ten year-old child and met his death at age 96? We do not know.

Louth notes that both Tertullian and Irenaeus reported that he had been a direct disciple of the apostle John (125).

Let’s look at two reminiscences from Irenaeus recorded in Eusebius’ EH:

First, see EH V.XX.4-8 where Eusbebius cites a letter from Irenaeus to Florinus.

Irenaeus here makes reference to being in Polycarp’s house as a child and listening to him firsthand as he “reported his intercourse with John and the others who had seen the Lord.” He recalls that he listened eagerly and made notes “not on paper, but in my heart.”

Second, see EH IV.XIV.3-9, where Eusebius quotes from book III of Irenaeus’ Against Heresies:

He also notes here how he saw Polycarp in his childhood and reports that he “constantly taught those things which he had learned from the apostles.”

It reports that he visited Rome and many heretics were converted under his ministry.

It is said that he told how he was with John in Ephesus in the baths when the Gnostic Cerinthus entered and John fled saying, “Let us flee, lest even the bath-house fall in, for within is Cerinthus, the enemy of the truth.”

It is also said that on a visit to Rome he met the Gnostic Marcion who demanded he recognize him, to which Polycarp responded, “I do, I recognize the first-born of Satan!” Compare his “Away with the infidels!” quip in the martyrdom report.

We have two documents related to Polycarp: (1) a letter from Polycarp to the Philippians and (2) an account of Polycarp’s martyrdom.

1.    Polycarp to the Philippians:

This letter is from Polycarp and his “clergy” (elders) to “the colony of God’s Church at Philippi” in Macedonia. We have Luke’s report of this church’s founding in Acts 16 and Paul’s letter to this church.

Polycarp apparently wrote this earlier in his ministry with regard to the journey of Ignatius of Antioch through Philippi.

In chapter 1 he speaks those in chains as “badges of saints” (Louth says this is likely Ignatius and his fellow prisoners).

In chapter 2 he offers exhortations which include this, “and bear in mind the words of our Lord in his teaching” and proceeds to quote from the Sermon on the Mount.

This leads to one of the key values of this letter: Its frequent citations from various NT books, showing the early acceptance and authority of the NT books.

See this table:

Poylcarp to the Philippians
NT and [Apocrypha] citations
Ch. 2
Matt 7.1; Matt 5:3
Ch. 4
1 Tim 6:7
Ch. 5
Gal 6:7; Gal 5:17; 1 Cor 6:9
Ch. 6
2 Cor 5:10
Ch. 7
1 John 4:2-3; 1 Peter 4:7; Matt 6:13; Matt 16:41
Ch. 8
1 Peter 2:22, 24
Ch. 10
[Tobit 12:9]
Ch. 11
1 Cor 6:2; 2 Cor 3:2
Ch. 12
Eph 4:26

In chapter 3 Polycarp notes that he does not have the wisdom of “our blessed and glorious Paul.” Note: He acknowledges that the age of the apostles has passed.

In this chapter he also makes reference to faith, hope, and love, likely drawing on 1 Corinthians 13, though not directly quoting any verses.

In chapter 4 he quotes 1 Timothy 6:7. I suppose this is the earliest citation from a Pastoral epistle. At the least it demonstrates the antiquity of the Pastoral epistles and, in my view, demonstrates its authenticity. Rather than recognize what to the traditionalist sees as obvious (Paul wrote the Pastoral epistles and Polycarp recognized them as Scripture), Louth notes that the German scholar Hans von Campenhausen argued that Polycarp was the author of the Pastoral epistles!

In chapter 5 he speaks about deacons being beyond approach and he also gives exhortations to younger men and women (as in Titus 2), as well encouraging obedience to elders and deacons (as in Ignatius).

In chapter 7 he cites 1 John 4:2-3 regarding the antichrists who deny that Jesus has come in the flesh. He adds: “To contradict the evidence of the cross is to be of the devil.”

In chapter 9 he calls for holiness recalling the examples of godly men, including Paul and the apostles. Again, this reflects his awareness of the apostolic age having passed.
In chapter 10 he urges the Philippians, “Stand firm,” and adds: “Be fixed and unshaken in your faith; care for each other with a brother’s love, and make common cause for the truth.”

Note that Louth sees here a citation (or allusion?) to Tobit 12:9. It might be a citation, but that does not mean that Polycarp saw the apocrphya as Scripture, while there is no doubt that he sees the NT as Scripture.

In chapter 11, Polycarp makes reference to an elder named Valens who had failed in his ministry, perhaps due to an “excessive fondness for money.”

He also cites 1 Cor 6:2 as Paul’s teaching and refers to the Philippians as those “with whom the blessed Paul labored.” Think about it. He is writing to some who had perhaps known Paul personally!

In chapter 13 he notes that he is sending along Ignatius letters by the hand of Crescens (ch. 14).

This is a very valuable letter.

2.    The Martyrdom of Polycarp:

Louth says this is considered “the earliest surviving authentic account of Christian martyrdom outside the NT” (127). It is in the form of a letter sent from the church at Smyrna to the church at Philomelium in Phrygia. It is signed by the scribe Evarestus.

The letter begins by noting the heroic deaths of Christian martyrs including one named Germanicus who was given over the beasts. But this does not satiate the blood lust of the pagans who screamed, “Down with the infidels! Go and find Polycarp!” (ch. 3).

The author also mentions the failure of a man named Quintus who had voluntarily offered up himself, but then suffered a failure of nerve, took the oath and offered incense to Caesar (ch. 4). The author argues against such volunteering for martyrdom, perhaps tempering the zeal demonstrated by Ignatius.

Polycarp was not alarmed but was urged to leave the city. He left for the country, but three days before his arrest while in prayer he had a vision of his pillow on fire and told his companions, “I must be going to be burned alive” (ch. 5).

He went to a farm but the authorities tracked him down, tortured  slave boy to find his precise whereabouts, and encircled the place where he was staying late at night. Polycarp then surrendered himself, saying, “God’s will be done.” He calmly greeted those coming to arrest him, chatted with them, and they were struck by his calmness (cf. the calmness of Socrates before his death in Plato’s Apology).

He was brought into the city riding on a donkey (paralleling the triumphal entry) and urged to say, “Caesar is Lord” (ch. 8). He refused and was taken to the city circus.

Chapter 9 notes a voice from heaven told him to be strong and play the man. When urged to say, “Down with the infidels!” he turned instead to the pagan crowd and said, “Down with the infidels!”

When the governor urged him, “Revile your Christ!” he offered his famous reply, “Eighty and six years have I served Him, and He has done me no wrong. How can I blaspheme my King and my Saviour?”

When the governor persisted, Polycarp told him, “I am a Christian” and if you want to know more about the meaning of Christianity, just name the day and hour and I will explain it to you (ch. 10).

When the governor threatened to burn him to death lest he recant, he replied, “The fire you threaten me with cannot go on burning for very long” (ch. 11).

He was eventually condemned to be burned and taken to the place of execution, stripped of his clothing, and tied to a stake to be burned (ch. 13).

The author said he was “like a noble ram” offered as a sacrifice (ch. 14). He lifted his eyes to heaven and thanks God that he might be “numbered amongst the martyrs.”

When the prayer ended, the fire was lit, but miraculously there was something like a “hollow chamber” formed around his figure and he was “like a loaf baking in the oven” that emits a “delicious fragrance” (ch. 15). There are, no doubt, allusions here to the three Hebrew youths in the burning fiery furnace in Daniel 3.

Finally, some “ruffians” were sent in with daggers to stab Polycarp. When, they did a dove flew out from his body and such a “copious rush of blood” issued from him that it extinguished the flames (ch. 16). The final verdict of the author is that Polycarp was clearly a great man among the elect, who “combined both apostle and prophet in his own person.”

The author notes how the authorities tried to stop the Christians from taking Polycarp’s remains as relics, fearing lest, “they should forsake the Crucified and take to worshipping this fellow instead” (ch. 17).

A centurion, however, took the body and had it burned and the Christians were able to gather up the bones, which to them were “more precious to us than jewels, and finer than pure gold” (ch. 18). The author also notes their practice of assembling where these remains were and remembering “the birthday of his martyrdom.”

Louth notes that this work provides “the earliest evidence for the preservation of the relics of the martyrs … and for the celebration of the anniversary of the martyrdom, the ‘heavenly birthday’ of the saint” (117).

The author concludes: “Not only was he a famous Doctor, he was a martyr without a peer; and one whose martyrdom all aspire to imitate, so fully does it accord with the Gospel of Christ” (ch. 19).

Conclusion:

First: Polycarp was a student of John the apostle and an important transition figure from the age of the apostles to the post-apostolic age.

Second: His epistle to the Philippians shows how the NT was being looked to as Scripture from the earliest times.

Third: The Martyrdom of Polycarp follows the accounts of NT martyrs, like Peter (John 21:18-19), Stephen (Acts 7), James (Acts 12), and Antipas of Pergamum (Rev 2:13).

It includes many more legendary elements and a focus on relics and memorials, not seen in the NT accounts. This demonstrates a drift from the apostolic accounts that will continue and which will attempt to be purified during the Reformation.

We should note, however, that the early Protestants will also claim Polycarp’s martyrdom as part of their history. The account of Polycarp’s martyrdom appeared in Foxe’s Book of Martyrs (without the reference to relics or memorials).

It remains a source of inspiration and encouragement for believers today, especially for the persecuted church.


JTR

Friday, January 12, 2018

The Vision (1.12.18): Augustine: Looking for something to love


Image: Fellowship meal at Lynchburg RB Mission (1.7.18)

Augustine of Hippo (354-430) was an early Christian leader and theologian in North Africa. His teaching stressed the sovereignty of God in salvation and his writings deeply influenced the later Protestant Reformers, including John Calvin. Reformed theology is, in fact, often described as being “Augustinian.”

Among his many writings is one called The Confessions, a work many consider to be the first autobiography. In this book, Augustine reviews his life as part of a spiritual confession to God. The opening chapter contains Augustine’s famous prayer, “thou hast made us for thyself and restless is our heart until it comes to rest in thee” (Book I, chapter 1).

Augustine carefully describes what his life was like before his conversion. Of his student days, he recalls (in Book III, chapter 1):

I was looking for something to love, for I was in love with loving, and I hated security and a smooth way, free from snares. Within me I had a dearth of that inner food which is thyself, my God—although that dearth caused me no hunger. And I remained without any appetite for incorruptible food—not because I was already filled with it, but because the emptier I became the more I loathed it. Because of this my soul was unhealthy; and full of sores, it exuded itself forth, itching to be scratched by the scraping of the senses.

He knew the Scriptures and sometimes read them, but they made no impact upon him:

For my inflated pride was repelled by their style, nor could the sharpness of my wit penetrate their inner meaning.

By God’s grace his eyes were eventually opened. His descriptions of his life before faith is helpful for believers for at least two reasons. First, it helps us remember our lives before Christ. Second, it helps us to understand those who are apart from him.

I have also found many parallels in The Confessions and what we have been hearing in our exposition through the Gospel of John. The Lord so often works slowly and patiently in the lives of men. Let’s remember this in our concern and prayers for those who are not believers and in considering the ongoing work of sanctification among the saints.


Grace and peace, Pastor Jeff Riddle

Wednesday, January 10, 2018

Poole on Peter and Primacy in John 21:15-17


Image: Altar in St. Alexander Roman Catholic Cathedral, Kiev, Ukraine, with inscription from the Latin hymn "Tantum ergo" from Thomas Aquinas.

Here’s another note on Matthew Poole’s commentary on Christ’s post-resurrection commission of Peter (John 21:15-17). Poole suggests that Christ’s commission is not just to Peter but to “his church” and objects to any Roman Catholic notion that it suggests the “primacy” of Peter:

Christ replies: Feed my lambs: by which he understands his people, his church; not the pastors of it, (as if Christ by this had made Peter the chief pastor over the rest of the apostles,) but the community. The papists from this text argue for Peter’s primacy and authority over his fellow apostles, as well as over the members of the church. But Christ said not to Peter only, but to all the rest of the eleven, Matt. xxviii.19; Mark vi.15 [BTW, note Poole's citation of Mark's traditional ending], Go ye, preach the gospel to all nations; and it was to the rest as well as to Peter that he said, chap. xx.23, Whose soever sins ye remit, they are remitted. So as it is apparent, whether feeding only signifies instructing, or feeding by doctrine, or (as most judge) comprehends government, and signifies that universal charge which ministers have over the church, the same power which Peter had was also committed to the other disciples.


JTR

Tuesday, January 09, 2018

Augustine on God: "Thou changest thy ways, leaving thy plans unchanged"


Image: St. Augustine, limestone, with paint and gilding, French. c. 1450. The Cloisters Collection, Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York.

I’ve started reading Augustine’s Confessions (trans. Albert C. Outler) and was taken by his meditation on God in Book I, chapter IV. It seems especially striking in light of recent challenges by some to classical theistic views on the sovereignty and impassibility of God. Augustine ably upholds the classical view of God, while also upholding the richness of Scripture’s revelation of who he is:

Most high, most excellent, most potent, most omnipotent; most merciful and most just; most secret and most truly present; most beautiful and most strong; stable, yet not supported; unchangeable, yet changing all things; never new, never old; making all things new, yet bringing old age upon the proud, and they know it not; always working, ever at rest; gathering, yet needing nothing; sustaining, pervading, and protecting; creating, nourishing, and developing; seeking, and yet possessing all things. Thou dost love, but without passion; art jealous, yet free from care; dost repent without remorse; art angry, yet remainest serene. Thou changest thy ways, leaving thy plans unchanged; thou recoverest what thou hast never really lost. Thou art never in need but still thou dost rejoice at thy gains; art never greedy, yet demands dividends. Men pay more than is required so that thou become a debtor; yet who can possess anything at all which is not already thine? Thou owest men nothing, yet payest out to them as if in debt to thy creature, and when thou dost cancel debts thou losest nothing thereby.


JTR

Monday, January 08, 2018

Matthew Poole on Christ's threefold question of Peter in John 21:15-17


I preached Sunday at the Lynchburg RB mission on John 21:1-19 (listen here), including Christ’s threefold question of Peter, “Lovest thou me?”, and his corresponding threefold commission to feed his sheep (see vv. 15-17). Matthew Poole has some interesting takes on why this question/commission was threefold:

Divines raise a question, why our Saviour propounds this question thrice to Peter. The most of the ancients agree, that it was because Peter thrice denied him. Some say it was to show his great love to his church, which he could not commit to Peter but after three inquiries if he truly loved him, who was the Lord of it. Others refer it to the three ways by which good pastors ought to feed the church; prayer, preaching, and a holy life. Others think, that it hath reference to the three flocks that Peter was to feed; the Jews in Judea, the Gentiles, the dispersed among the Gentiles.


JTR

Friday, January 05, 2018

The Vision (1.5.18): Eating Christ's Flesh and Drinking His Blood


Image: Thanksgiving desserts at the Riddle house, November 23, 2017. Peanut butter pie, pecan pie, pumpkin pie, apple pie, and banana pudding.
Have we tasted of faith in Christ?

Devotion taken from study notes for sermon on John 6:52-58.
John 6:53 Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat of the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you. 54 Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him at the at the last day.
Is this passage about communion? No. If that were the case, it would be teaching justification by the work of taking the Lord’s Supper, and the Bible would be incoherent and internally contradictory (cf. Eph 2:8-9).
It is, instead, about saving faith in Christ and, in particular, about faith in what he has accomplished in the cross when he gave up his flesh for the life of the world (cf. John 6:51).
Matthew Poole on v. 53:
The short and true sense of these words is, that without a true believing in the Lord Jesus Christ, as he who died for our sins, no man hath any thing in him of true spiritual life, nor shall ever come to eternal life.
John Calvin on v. 54:
From these words, it plainly appears that this whole passage is improperly explained as applied to the Lord’s Supper. For if it were true that all who present themselves at the holy table of the Lord are made partakers of his flesh and blood, all will, in like manner, obtain life; but we know there are many who partake of it to their condemnation. And indeed it would have been foolish and unreasonable to discourse about the Lord’s Supper, before he had instituted it. It is certain, then, that he now speaks of the perpetual and ordinary manner of eating the flesh of Christ, which is done by faith only.
He adds, however:
And yet, at the same time, I acknowledge that there is nothing said here that is not figuratively represented, and actually bestowed on believers, in the Lord’s Supper.
Of course, the one who takes the Lord’s Supper aright is first and foremost a believer.
The questions we are meant to ask are:
Have I trusted in the cross work of Christ?
Have I ingested Christ? Have I eaten of his flesh and drunk of his blood? Has he become my necessary food?
Have I come into union with Christ, I in him and he in me?

Grace and peace, Pastor Jeff Riddle

Thursday, January 04, 2018

An atheist accurately describes "the end of text criticism"


I recently ran across the neo-atheistic anthology The End of Christianity (Prometheus, 2011), edited by “deconverted” (we’d prefer “false professor”) former pastor John W. Loftus. One of the chapters is Hector Avalos’ “Why Biblical Studies Must End” (pp. 107-130).

The chapter includes a section on modern text criticism that caught my attention. Here are a few excerpts of Avalos' analysis (pp. 114-116):

Textual criticism is the scholarly discipline that seeks to reconstruct the most original text possible for any particular written work. Such a discipline, therefore, is not restricted to the Bible.… Unlike most works of antiquity, however, the textual criticism of the Bible carries crucial theological and moral consequences for those who believe they must have an accurate record of God’s word to guide the conduct of their lives.

Yet, in the past few decades, there have been some prominent textual critics who have worried whether this field will survive….

The findings of textual criticism devastate any claim that the Bible has been transmitted faithfully from any original text….. Textual criticism, in fact, has helped destroy any notion that there was ever a stable entity called “the Bible.”….

The “original text” proves to be a mirage unless we have access to the entire transmission process from inception to current copy. Such access is something we don’t have, and probably never will have in the case of the Bible….

Textual criticism has made important contributions to our understanding of the Bible. However, those contributions have spelled the end of textual criticism. Historically, the primary goal of biblical textual criticism was to reconstruct the original text. Textual criticism has shown that this is impossible. Thus, textual criticism has ended in that sense. Textual criticism of the Bible becomes more than ever an elite leisure pursuit that will have difficulty asking taxpayer and churchgoers to continue funding an endeavor that brings joys akin to solving Sudoku puzzles but provides little benefit to anyone else.

This atheistic writer sees clearly what many contemporary evangelicals who continue to embrace the modern critical text and the method that produced it do not. Namely, that modern text criticism is a foe and not a friend to confessional Christianity and the authority of the Bible. It was based on a effort to reconstruct the original text, an endeavor which has now been abandoned as hopeless. It is an “elite pursuit” that yield little benefit.

There is an alternative: the confessional text.


JTR

Wednesday, January 03, 2018

Lynchburg Reformed Baptist Mission


Image: LRBM meeting (11.26.17)

The Lynchburg Reformed Baptist Mission (LRBM) is a church plant which was formed on November 26, 2017 when four households committed to this new work. This mission did not begin out of division within any existing church or churches but simply came about through a group of people who live in the Lynchburg, Virginia area who have come together desiring to see a confessional Reformed Baptist church formed in their community.

I am serving as supervising Elder for this new work and look forward to preaching in their services this Sunday, January 7, 2018 as they begin weekly Lord's Day morning meetings. I will also be giving oversight to their pulpit supply in coming Sundays.



Image: LRBM meeting site in the New London community

The LRBM will meet at the New London Historical Society church building (672 Alum Springs Rd., Forest, Virginia 24551). This church building was once the home of the New London Methodist Church, a congregation which disbanded in 2000. We are thankful to have the opportunity to use this historic meeting location for upcoming worship services.

The regular Sunday schedule for the LRBM will be:

10:30 am        Morning Worship

12:00 noon     Covered Dish Lunch on site

1:00 pm          Afternoon Worship

A website for the LRBM is being developed by one of the mission team members, where updates can be found on the work. If you live in the Lynchburg community and are looking for a confessional RB church or know someone who might be interested, please feel free to spread the word.


JTR

Tuesday, January 02, 2018

2017 Reading Highlights (WM 87)



Note: I have posted an expanded audio version of this article as WM 87: 2017 Reading Highlights (listen here).

Otium sine litteris mors est. –Seneca

When thou comest bring with thee … the books. –Paul to Timothy (2 Tim 4:13)

The end of the year means another annual list of books read. Hard to believe that this is the tenth year I’ve compiled such a list as a blog post (see previous lists below):

Here are ten highlights from 2017 reading, in no particular order:

1.    William R. Farmer, The Last Twelve Verses of Mark (Cambridge University Press, 1974): 124 pp.

Farmer is best known for challenging the reigning modern scholarly consensus on Markan Priority with his revival of the Griesbach Hypothesis, in favor of Matthean priority. Here he takes on another scholarly “consensus,” by challenging the reigning rejection of the authenticity of the traditional ending of Mark.

2.    George Orwell, 1984 (original 1949; Signet reprint, 1980): 268 pp.

Orwell’s account of a dystopian socialist society marked by the subversion of the historical record, Newspeak, and totalitarian conformity is timely and frightening.

3.    Christopher Hitchens, Hitch 22: A Memoir (Twelve, 2010): 435 pp.

The memoir of this gifted, witty and irreverent writer, political pundit, and anti-theist, whose life was cut down by cancer, is a reminder that unbelievers can sometimes hold penetrating insights into the world God has made, but that life means nothing apart from faith in Christ.

4.    Robert Louis Stevenson, Kidnapped (original 1886; Scribner’s 1940): 289 pp.

I read this book aloud with my family after supper over the course of several weeks. I began each reading by rehearsing the extended title, which my boys came to be able to recite by heart: “Kidnapped: Being memoirs of the adventures of David Balfour in the year 1751, how he was kidnapped and cast away; his sufferings in a desert isle; his journey into the wild highlands; his acquaintance with Alan Breck Stewart and other notorious highland Jacobites; with all he suffered at the hands of his uncle, Ebenezer Balfour of Shaws, falsely so called; written by himself and now set forth by Robert Louis Stevenson.” This edition also has ten striking full color illustration of various scenes that we all found engaging.

5. Robert Letham, Through Western Eyes: Eastern Orthodoxy: A Reformed Perspective (Mentor, 2007): 319 pp.

I read this work before making my August visit to Ukraine. It helped me understand Eastern Orthodoxy better, as a branch of the Christian tradition that never experienced a Reformation and was largely untouched by the Enlightenment. Letham’s presentation is sympathetic at points but also clear in tracing a Protestant critique of the Eastern Orthodoxy.

6.    B. S. Poh, The Fundamentals of Our Faith: Studies on the 1689 Baptist Confession of Faith (Good News Enterprises, 2017): 147 pp.

I read this book just before Pastor Poh (along with his wife Goody) came from Kula Lampur to preach at the 2017 Keach Conference and to spend a week with our family. Pastor Poh is a choice servant of Christ with much to say worth hearing. I have also found this work helpful in my ongoing Sunday afternoon series through the 1689 confession.

7.    Charles Bridges, Ecclesiastes (Banner of Truth, 1800, 1961): 319.

I completed this classic commentary as I finished up a Sunday morning sermon series through this wisdom book. This is a faithful, devotional work, that is unequalled in piety and spiritual usefulness by modern commentaries.

8.    Ibn Warraq, Why I am Not a Muslim (Prometheus Books, 1995, 2003): 402 pp.

This critique of Islam from a dissident Pakistani intellectual (writing under an assumed name) is the sort book that only a former insider could have written. Very valuable. Sadly, however, Warraq embraces atheism, so many of his naturalistic critiques of Islam could be applied to other religions. One wonders what he might have written had he ever stumbled upon a winsome and compelling understanding of Christianity.

9.  Irving Hexham, Understanding World Religions: An Interdisciplinary Approach (Zondervan, 2011): 512 pp.

I used this as a textbook in a college level “Religions of the World” class that I taught last semester. Hexham is a Christian scholar who teaches at the University of Calgary. From the book’s content I surmise that he is a continuationist. Despite this and some progressive views on other topics, I found this to be a quite helpful work in understanding various world religions, especially African religions (Hexham’s speciality).

10. Fyodor Dostoyevsky, The Brothers Karamazov (translated by Constance Garnett (original, 1879-1880; Garnet translation, 1912): via LibriVox.

I continued to listen to a number of audio books this year on LibriVox, a great free resource, including this classic. I had long wanted to read this book, so I at least got to listen to it before my trip to Ukraine. It really helped me get a better feel for Russian culture and for Eastern Orthodox piety. This is a very theologically rich novel, not the least for the famed “Grand Inquisitor” section.

Here are some other things I completed reading this year:

Biblical studies, text criticism, early Christianity:

Richard N. Longenecker, The Ministry and Message of Paul (Zondervan, 1971): 130 pp.; Jason Harris, The Doctrine of Scripture (In Focus, 2006, 2013): 182 pp.; John D. Currid, Ecclesiastes: A Quest for Meaning (Evangelical Press, 2015): 155 pp.; Joseph Hoffman, Celsus on the True Doctrine: A Discourse Against Christians (Oxford, 1987): 146 pp.; Debating the Text of the Word of God: Douglas Wilson vs. James R. White (Simposio, 2017): 103 pp.; Harry Freedman, The Murderous History of Bible Translations: Power, Conflict, and the Quest for Meaning (Bloomsbury Press, 2016): 248 pp.; Robert Haldane, The Books of the Old and New Testaments Proven to be Canonical (1830; Sprinkle, 2014): 176 pp.

Eastern Orthodoxy:

Archbishop Paul of Finland, The Faith We Hold (St. Vladimir Seminary, 1978, 1980): 96 pp.; Vitaly Klos, St. Michael’s Golden Domed Monastery: Guidebook (N. D.): 57 pp.; Archpriest Josiah Trentham, Rock and Sand: An Orthodox Appraisal of the Protestant Reformers and Their Theology (New Rome Press, 2015): 401 pp.

Theological and Pastoral studies:

Wade Burleson, Fraudulent Authority: Pastors Who Seek to Rule Over Others (Istoria Ministries, 2017): 166 pp.; Herman Hanko and David J. Engelsma, The Five Points of Calvinism (British Reformed Fellowship, 2008): 119 pp.; David J. Engelsma and Herman Hanko, The Reformed Worldview: The Word of God for Our Generation (British Reformed Fellowship, 2012): 142 pp.; Rod Dreher, The Benedict Option: A Strategy for Christians in a Post-Christian Nation (Sentinel, 2017): 262 pp.; Peter Enns, The Sin of Certainty: Why God Desires Our Trust More Than Our “Correct” Beliefs (HarperOne, 2016): 230 pp.; Thomas Howard, Evangelical Is Not Enough: Worship of God in Liturgy & Sacrament (Ignatius, 1984): 162 pp.

Politics, Religion, Philosophy:

Sam Harris, Free Will (Free Press, 2012): 83 pp.; Roger Scruton and Mark Dooley, Conversations with Roger Scruton (Bloomsbury, 2016): 213 pp.; R. B. Blackney, Ed. and Trans., The Way of Life: Lao Tzu (Mentor, 1955): 134 pp.; George Grant, Technology and Empire (Anasi, 1969): 143 pp.; Alvin Plantinga, Knowledge and Christian Belief (Eerdmans, 2015): 129 pp.; Gordan H. Clark, Religion, Reason, and Revelation (Craig Press, 1961): 241 pp.; Patrick J. Buchanan, The Death of the West (St. Martin’s Press, 2002): 308 pp.; Peter Hitchens, The Cameron Delusion (Continuum, 2010): 204 pp.

Literary Essays, Poetry, Fiction:

Adam Zagajewski, A Defense of Ardor, Trans. By Clare Cavanagh (Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2004): 198 pp.; Christian Wiman, My Bright Abyss: Meditations of a Modern Believer (Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2013): 182 pp.; Madeleine L’Engle, The Weather of the Heart (Harold Shaw, 1978): 96 pp.; David Whyte, The House of Belonging (Many Rivers Press, 2011): 98 pp.; David Whyte, Everything is Waiting For You: Poems by David Whyte (Many Rivers Press, 2003): 102 pp.; David Whyte, Pilgrim: Poems by David Whyte (Many Rivers Press, 2014): 95 pp.; Hannu Rajaniemi, The Quantum Thief (Tom Doherty Associates, 2010): 370 pp.; Owen Stanley, The Missionaries (Castiglia House, 2016): 199 pp.; George Eliot, Middlemarch (1872): via LibriVox; Henry Melville, Moby-Dick; or The Whale (1851): via LibriVox; Gaius Petronius Arbiter, Satyricon (c. 1st century AD): via LibriVox; Thomas Moore, Utopia, trans. Gilbert Burnet, ed. Henry Morley (Latin original 1516): via LibriVox; Henry Adams, Democracy: An American Novel (1880): via LibriVox; Henry James, Daisy Miller (1879): via LibriVox.

Biographies:

Mark Galli, Karl Barth: An Introductory Biography for Evangelicals (Eerdmans, 2017): 176 pp.; D. T. Max, Every Love Story is a Ghost Story: A Life of David Foster Wallace (Viking, 2012): 356 pp.; Ian Smith, Bitter Harvest: Zimbabwe and the Aftermath of its Independence (John Blake, 1997, 2001, 2008): 442 pp.; Robert Spencer, The Truth About Muhammad: Founder of the World’s Most Dangerous Religion (Regnery, 2005): 224 pp.; Einhard, The Life of Charlemagne (University of Michigan Press, 2011): 98 pp.

For past annual reading reviews look here:











JTR