Friday, May 27, 2016
Image: Rhododendron, North Garden, Virginia, May 2016
Note: Here’s the conclusion to the Sunday am sermon at CRBC from Hebrews 10:26-31 on May 15 titled “Another Warning Against Apostasy.”
It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God (Hebrews 10:31).
This concept of sinners falling into the hands of the living God is perhaps best known from a sermon preached by Jonathan Edwards on July 8, 1741 in Enfield, Connecticut, which is credited with beginning the Great Awakening in New England. His sermon was titled, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” (read it here).
It is said that though he read the sermon from his manuscript in a monotone it provoked gasps and tears from the congregation as they listened.
Nowadays the sermon often appears in literary anthologies to show the supposed judgmentalism and legalism of the Puritans!
Edwards’ text was not Hebrews 10:31 but Deuteronomy 32:35 “There foot shall slide in due time.” One of the best known passages in that sermon comes in what he called the “applications”:
The God that holds you over the pit of hell, much as one holds a spider, or some loathsome insect over the fire, abhors you, and is dreadfully provoked: his wrath towards you burns like fire; he looks upon you as worthy of nothing else, but to be cast into the fire; he is of purer eyes than to bear to have you in his sight; you are ten thousand times more abominable in his eyes, than the most hateful venomous serpent is in ours. You have offended him infinitely more than ever a stubborn rebel did his prince;
But then Edwards adds this:
and yet it is nothing but his hand that holds you from falling into the fire every moment. It is to be ascribed to nothing else, that you did not go to hell the last night; that you was suffered to awake again in this world, after you closed your eyes to sleep. And there is no other reason to be given, why you have not dropped into hell since you arose in the morning, but that God's hand has held you up.
The hand of God is not just a hand of judgment and wrath but it is also a hand of patience and preservation!
It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God. It is a blessed thing to be upheld by the hand of the living God.
Would you not choose to be among those who cling to Christ rather than be among those who hatefully spurn him?
Grace and peace, Pastor Jeff Riddle
Monday, May 23, 2016
Image: Group Picture
We had a great time last weekend at the first annual CRBC sponsored Youth and Young Adult Conference at the Machen Conference Center in Highland County, Virginia.
Pastor Chris Sheffield of Grace RBC in Rocky Mount, NC brought three encouraging messages (appropriate for those of any age) which are now posted online:
Here are some scenes from the weekend:
Image: Playing the get to know you game, "Find Someone Who..."
Images: For dessert after supper Friday night, we played a Reformed Baptist version of the television show "Chopped." Each group was given a bowl with the same ingredients (cookie dough, marshmallows, strawberries, whipped cream, Graham crackers, and a package of kool-aid) and asked to make dessert. Serious cooking ensued:
Below are some of the creations:
Images: The last dish was the winner, despite what was dubbed the "pond scum" color of the topping.
Image: Teaching session.
Images: Recreation, from "spoons" to "Heads Up!"
Friday, May 20, 2016
CRBC “Puritan” Vacation Bible School
June 20-23, 2016 (Monday-Thursday)
@ Bells Grove Church (2997 Courthouse Road, Louisa, VA)
Image: Singing "The Fruit of the Spirit" at the 2015 VBS
2016 Theme: The Life and Letters of the Apostle Peter
VBS is for children ages preschool to 12. Older children (ages 13-18) will be youth helpers. Parents and family may also stay and participate in the sessions if they like.
Free Light Lunch will be served on site for participants and families daily from 12:30—1:00 pm.
VBS Daily Schedule:
9:50 am—10:00 am Arrival
10:00 am—10:30 am Opening (procession, songs, etc.)
10:30 am—10:45 am Bible Lesson
10:45 am—11:15 am Recreation
11:15 am—11:30 am Refreshment Break
11:30 am—12:00 pm Craft
12:00 am—12:15 pm Bible Lesson Review
12:15 pm—12:30 pm Closing
12:30 pm—1:00 pm Lunch/Pick-up
VBS Daily Bible Topics:
Monday: Peter follows Jesus (Mark 1:16-20)
Tuesday: Peter confesses that Jesus is the Christ (Mark 8:27-38)
Wednesday: Peter denies Jesus (Matthew 26:31-35, 69-75; John 21:15-19)
Thursday: Peter Ministers as an Apostle (Acts 2; 9:32-43; 10; 1-2 Peter)
Thursday, May 19, 2016
A recent local story here made national news when a self-proclaimed psychic was indicted for bilking her “clients” out of over a million dollars, after promising to remove curses for them. I have often driven by her house, located off Rt. 29 North of Charlottesville, with its prominent sign advertising “psychic readings.”
That story brought to mind a section I recently read from Augustine’s On Christian Doctrine (Book II, Section XX), in which the theologian describes early Christianity’s opposition to “superstitious things” instituted by men, including “prognostications,” “magical arts,” “books of haruspicy and augery,” the wearing of amulets, “enchantments,” “secret signs,” and other occult acts.
Augustine proceeds to list a number of superstitious practices common in his context (4-5th century Roman North Africa), including:
Wearing rings hung on the top of each ear and little ostrich bone rings on the fingers for good luck;
Telling a person with hiccups to cure his condition by holding his left thumb in his right hand;
It’s bad luck “if a limb trembles, or if a stone, dog, or child comes between friends, walking arm in arm [he notes that some on these occasions have been known to slug a small child with his fist and to strike dogs as well, though some dogs have bitten the attacker back!];
Kicking a stone can destroy a friendship;
It’s good luck to step on the threshold if you leave your house by the front door;
If you sneeze when putting on your shoes in the morning you should go back to bed;
If you stumble when leaving your house, you should go back home;
If mice gnaw on your clothes it is an omen of future ill [He cites an anecdote from Cato who when consulted by a man worried that mice has gnawed on his shoes replied there was nothing strange about that, “but that it would be strange indeed if the shoes had gnawed the mice”!].
Before we laugh at the ancients we should consider those today who carry a rabbit’s foot or who avoid stepping on cracks, having a black cat cross their path, or walking under ladders (though the latter has a practical dimension).
Augustine is describing how the rise of Christianity brought the rise of reasonable thinking and liberation from slavish superstition and occult practices. Of course, this was evident even in the time of the apostles when the converts at Ephesus got rid of their books of “curious arts” (Acts 19:18-19).
The formula is simple: more Christianity leads to less superstition; Less Christianity leads to more superstition. As we enter what some demographers are calling a “post-Christian” society, we must wonder if this will mean more superstition and less reason.
Tuesday, May 17, 2016
I recently read Barry Goldwater’s 1960 booklet “The Conscience of a Conservative.”
When I heard last week of President Obama’s letter to public schools regarding “trans-gender” pupils and bathrooms and threats to take away federal funding for those who fail to comply, it brought to mind Goldwater’s chapter nine “Some Notes on Education.” In citing his objections to any federal aid for education (see also chapter three “States’ Rights”), Goldwater wrote the following:
The first [objection] is that federal intervention in education is unconstitutional. It is the fashion these days to say that responsibility for education “traditionally” rests with the local community—as a prelude to proposing an exception to the tradition in the form of federal aid. This “tradition,” let us remember, is also the law. It is sanctioned by the Constitution of the United States, for education is one of the powers reserved to the States by the Tenth Amendment. Therefore, any federal aid program, however desirable it might appear, must be regarded as illegal until such time as the Constitution is amended.
The second objection is that the alleged need for federal funds has never been convincingly demonstrated....
The third objection to federal aid is that it promotes the idea that federal money is “free” money, and thus gives the people a distorted picture of the cost of education….
The fourth objection is that federal aid to education inevitably means federal control of education….
Goldwater then addresses the basic philosophical problems with those who desire central control of public education. Here are a few sound bites from his comments:
In the main, the trouble with American education is that we have put into practice the educational philosophy expounded by John Dewey and his disciples. In varying degree we have adopted what has been called “progressive education.”
In our attempt to make education “fun,” we have neglected the academic disciplines that develop sound minds and are conducive to sound characters.
Most important of all: in our anxiety to “improve” the world and insure “progress’ we have permitted schools to become laboratories for social and economic change according to the predilections of professional educators. We have forgotten that the proper function of the school is to transmit the cultural heritage of one generation to the next generation, and to so train the minds of the new generation as to make them capable of absorbing ancient learning and apply it to the problem of its own day.
We should look upon our schools—not as a place to train the “whole character” of the child—a responsibility that properly belongs to his family and church—but to train his mind.
I am struck by Goldwater’s prophetic sense of where things were heading from his vantage point over fifty years ago and his warnings about the dangers of federal control of education and the efforts toward social manipulation to which it would lead. It is also striking to think that the Republicans had men in those days who could think in this way, who were philosophically and principally grounded, and who could articulate those thoughts cogently. They even put these sorts of men up for the highest office in the land (though Goldwater famously lost in a landslide in 1964).
I think the most important immediate take away for Christians from this recent bathroom letter episode, aside from any practical political efforts that might be made by Christian citizens in opposition to it, will be renewed consideration of the ethics of Christian participation in public schools. As has been quipped, “If you send your children to Caesar, you should not be surprised when they come back as Romans!” There has, of course, already been a significant exodus of Christians to private Christian schools and to home-education. There will need to be more encouragement and assistance in this in the future, as well as the defense of our rights to do so, a battle which might be on the horizon.
Friday, May 13, 2016
Note: Here are some notes from last Sunday morning’s sermon which focused on the three exhortations in Hebrews 10:22-25:
First exhortation (v. 22): “Let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith….”
Why would anyone in his right mind stand apart from Christ? Would a man freezing to death not draw near to a roaring fire? Would a starving man not draw near to a banquet of food? Would a sick man not draw near to a physician? Would an exhausted man not draw near to rest?
The answer to spiritual struggle is never that you need less of Christ. Or that you need to distance yourself from Christ. It is always that you need more. That you need to come closer.
Second exhortation (v. 23): “Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering….”
This is a call to commitment to Christ that lasts over the long haul. Hold fast to your profession [homologia: confession]. Be a man of your word! Do not waver.
I’ll never forget the time when a friend from seminary stopped to see me and told me he was now a Buddhist. Trading Christ for Buddha is like trading a golden treasure house for a handful of ashes.
You show you are a believer by remaining a believer.
Notice v. 23 b: “for he is faithful that promised.” Where is the focus? On the one who perseveres? On the believer’s faithfulness? No, but on God’s faithfulness. If we hold fast to our profession it is only by the grace of God!
Third exhortation (vv. 24-25): “And let us consider one another…. Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together….”
This exhortation relates to remaining true to the body of Christ, the local and visible body of believers. Staying true to Christ also means staying true to his church. It speaks to the mutual benefits of community.
Believers consider one another and provoke one another. This does not encompass malicious provocation. This does not mean hypocritical or high-minded judging. It does not mean attacking, demeaning, maligning, insulting or putting down a fellow believer. It means healthy exhortation by word and deed. To what end?
To the provocation [eis to paroxusmon; the noun here is the root for the English word “paroxysm”: a sudden attack or violent expression of a particular emotion or activity] of love and good works.
We are exhorted to love (agape). This means love of neighbor. It also means love of the brethren.
We are exhorted to good works. Our emphasis on justification by faith does not mean we are against good works. Paul is not at odds with James. Faith without works is dead. Consider:
Ephesians 2:10 For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus unto good works, which God hath before ordained that we should walk in them.
Titus 2:14 Who gave himself for us, that he might redeem us from all iniquity, and purify unto himself a peculiar people, zealous of good works.
And it includes not forsaking the assembling of believers (episynagago; v. 25). Some are spiritual gypsies, floating here and there and never settling down. Some make public commitments, even sign covenants, then turn around and break their word. We need to come to church. We need the meetings! We need to be de-toxed from the world. We need to meet with each other, but more than that we need to meet with our God.
The tabernacle of old was called the tent of meeting. The answer for many spiritual problems is: More meetings needed. More meetings with God’s people, and, most importantly, more meetings with our God.
Hold fast to Christ!
Hold fast to your profession!
Hold fast to God’s people!
Grace and peace, Pastor Jeff Riddle
Thursday, May 12, 2016
Image: From facsimile of KJV (1611)
Last Sunday morning I preached on Hebrews 10:11-25 at CRBC. A point of text/translation arose with v. 23.
The question: Should Hebrews 10:23 read “profession of our faith” or “profession of our hope”?
In this case, there is a difference even within editions of the King James Version tradition, with some reading “faith” and others “hope.”
The Greek text:
In this case there is little controversy with the Greek text.
Both the TR and the modern critical text read: katechomen ten homologion tes elpidos akline [let us hold fast the confession of (our) faith without wavering].
The key point is that both include the noun elpis [hope] rather than pistis [faith]. The apparatus to the modern critical text does not show any textual variation at this point.
The Greek mss. read elpis. One variation of note, however, is the fact that the pronoun “our” [hemon] is included in the original hand of Sinaiticus, the Old Latin, and Syriac Peshitta.
Survey of various translations:
Luther’s 1522 NT reads hope (hoffnung) rather than faith: Lasst uns festhalten an dem Bekinntnis der Hoffnung
Tyndale’s NT reads hope (from the modern-spelling edition of the 1534 translation): and let us keep the profession of our hope
Karolyi ‘s 1590 Hungarian translation reads hope (reménység): tartsuk meg a reménységnek vallását
The Geneva Bible (from 1599 edition) reads hope: let us keep the profession of our hope
The original edition of the King James Version, however, reads faith: Let us hold fast the profession of our faith
Modern translations, including the NKJV, uniformly read hope rather than faith (cf. RSV, NASB, NIV, NKJV, NRSV, ESV, etc.).
Variations in later editions of the King James Version:
As noted, though the 1611 edition of the KJV reads faith rather than hope, some later editions of the KJV read hope.
The Cambridge Paragraph Bible of 1873 (Hendricksen, 2009) edited by F. H. A. Scrivener, reads “hope” rather than “faith.” My guess is that the editor sought to conform this edition to what he perceived was a more literal approximation of the Greek original (elpis).
Why does the KJV read “faith”? There are, I believe, two possibilities for the KJV rendering. One is that the KJV translators had access to an early mss. which read “faith” [pistis] rather than “hope” [elpis], which they privileged. More likely, this is probably an example of the KJV translators’ commitment to variation in English renderings of the underlying original language words. As the translators tell the reader in the preface: “we have not tied ourselves to an uniformity of phrasing, or to an identity of words, as some peradventure would wish that we had done” (see “The Translators to the Reader”). In this case, the translators rendered elpis as “faith” rather than its more typical translation as “hope.” As with the KJV’s rendering of Paul’s stock phrase me genoito as “God forbid” the KJV translators here make a rare preference for a more dynamic than formal rendering. Perhaps this was to give emphasis to the noun homologia, confession or profession, with the translators conveying that the essential meaning of a “profession of hope” would be a “profession of faith.” We must also keep in mind that the great “faith” chapter (Hebrews 11) follows this passage.
Is this rendering legitimate? In his commentary on the verse, John Owen observes: “Wherefore holding fast our hope, includes in it the holding fast of our faith, as the cause is in the effect, and the building in the foundation” (Hebrews, Vol. 6, p. 515). Owen proceeds to make clear his preference for the translation “profession of faith” noting it “is more suited to unto the design of the apostle, and his following discourse” (Ibid). When I preached on Sunday, I felt comfortable using the KJV rendering without making reference to variations in translation.