The Vision (6.20.25): Putting on the New Man

 

Image: Butterfly bush, North Garden, Virginia, June 2025.

Note: Devotion taken from last Sunday's sermon on Ephesians 4:17-24.

Ephesians 4:22 That ye put off concerning the former conversation the old man, which is corrupt according to the deceitful lusts; 23 And be renewed in the spirit of your mind; 24 And that ye put on the new man, which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness.

Paul uses here an inspired metaphor, based on taking off and putting on clothing.

First, in v. 22, he exhorts the Ephesians believers to “put off…the old man.” This is a call to put off the old way of life, the way one lived when he was unregenerate.

When you get your clothes soiled and dirty, you take them off and you put on fresh and clean clothes.

Paul then exhorts, “And be renewed in the spirit of your mind” (v. 23). In Romans 12:1-2 Paul urged believers not to be conformed to this world but to be “transformed by the renewing of your mind.”

Paul then exhorts in v. 24: “And that ye put on the new man….”

Taking off the old man is one part of the transformation, but it is necessarily accompanied by a second part: putting on the new man.

Some theologians rightly speak of the necessity of both mortification (putting to death the old ways) and vivification (coming to life to the new ways). We need both.

R. C. Sproul offered the following thoughts on this passage:

Once I have been made alive to God through his divine initiative, quickened by his regenerating grace, my heart now throbs with spiritual life. There is now a radical discontinuity between my new self and my old self. It is not a total discontinuity.  A link remains between the old and the new man. The old man has been dealt a death blow, his destination is certain, but he is not yet dead. As Christians we are to feed the new man with all the means of grace that God has appointed and at the same time starve the old man denying him the occasions for sin (Ephesians,115-116).

The saved man not only gives up swearing, but he uses his tongue to bless.

The saved man not only gives up lust, but he gives his mind to wholesome and chaste thought.

The saved man not only gives up gluttony and sloth, but he takes up health and diligence.

Paul emphasizes here that the new man is a work of God’s creation. God made the world by his fiat power, and he makes new believers by that same power: “which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness.”

In 2 Corinthians 5:17 Paul likewise states that “if any man be in Christ, he is a new creature: old things are passed away; behold, all things are become new.”

May the Lord help us, in this age, continually to put off the old man and put on the new man, until the time when, by God’s grace, we enter into the state of glory.

Grace and peace, Pastor Jeff Riddle

Audio Series: Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History

 

From X post:

Back in 2019-2020 I did a 126-part audio series of unabridged readings through all 10 books of Eusebius' *Ecclesiastical History* and offering a brief commentary and notes on each section read.

I was reminded of the series when I got this encouraging email from a listener yesterday:

Hello Pastor Riddle,

I am sending this note to thank you for recording Eusebius, The Ecclesiastical History.  I recently completed the series and it was so nice to be able to listen when I had time, usually in the car.  Your notes and commentary at the end were extra helpful to pull everything together at the end of each episode and made the material much more meaningful and memorable.

If interested you can find the series here.

JTR

Video Clip: Will there be evidence of faith in the life of a believer?

 

 

 JTR

Book Note: Archaic or Accurate? The translation of scripture and how we address God in praise and prayer--Thou or You?

From X post:

In confessional Reformed circles we often bemoan the decline of reverence and sobriety in corporate worship. In response we rightly appeal to and advocate for a return to the Protestant teaching and practice of the Regulative Principle of worship.

In addition, among English speakers, one wonders what has been the impact of declining use of reverential pronouns in addressing God? How was this decline been another result of the downgrade of many modern translations? This shift has, in fact, only been relatively recent.

Is it possible that we English speakers might make reverential pronouns “great again” in our prayers and sung praise?

I’ve been reading this little book Archaic or Accurate? The translation of the scriptures, and how we address God in praise and prayer—Thou or You? and have found it helpful. It is a collection of short articles on this theme from the Bible League Quarterly, edited by John Thackway. I commend it.

Here are a few samples from "Archaic or Accurate?": the opening paragraph to the book’s Foreword and the opening paragraph plus from one of its best short articles on “The Use of Thee and Thou in Prayer.”

Subscription to the Bible League Quarterly is a bargain. You can get the online version for just 5 pounds (less that 7 dollars) per year. Great devotional resource for all Christians and helpful sermon resource for pastors.

https://bibleleaguetrust.org/the-quarterly/

JTR

Note: On the translation/interpretation of Ephesians 4:12

From X post:

Believe it or not, I only rarely ever address issues related to text or translation of the Bible from the pulpit in my regular Lord’s Day preaching (given our church’s uniformity of practice), but yesterday I did briefly address the translation/interpretation of Ephesians 4:12 (listen to the sermon here). My notes:

There is a major question about how to translate Ephesians 4:12, and a big part of that involves a single comma.

The older Protestant translations, like the AV, generally list three things that the pastor-teachers are supposed to do:

“For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ.”

First, they are to labor at the “perfecting [maturing] of the saints.” Christ said, “Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect” (Matthew 5:48). In Colossians 1:28 Paul said the goal of his ministry was, “that we may present every man perfect in Christ Jesus.”

Second, they are to do the work of ministry. What is the work of ministry? We get an idea of this from Acts 6:4 when the apostles said they wanted to give themselves to prayer and the ministry of the Word.

Third, they labor “for the edifying of the body of Christ.” They want to see the spiritual health, safety, and spiritual growth of God’s people.

In the 20^th century some translations removed the first comma and said Paul was saying the task of ministers was to equip all the saints for the work of ministry. Compare:

NIV: “to equip his people for works of service, so that the body of Christ may be built up”

ESV: “to equip the saints for the work of ministry, for building up the body of Christ,”

It probably won’t surprise you to learn that I think the older translation is best. I think so for two reasons:

First, it reflects the grammar of the original Greek construction better. There are three distinct prepositional phrases (προς… εις… εις…).

Second, theologically and functionally it fits better the description elsewhere given of the special roles given to ministers.

The new translations reflect a modern egalitarian view. I remember growing up in SBC churches where the theme in many of those churches was “every member a minister.” To a certain degree that is true. All Christians are called to ministry. But not all are called to be pastors and teachers. See James 3:1: “My brethren, be not many master [teachers]….” And it is this special role that Paul is describing here.

JTR

The Vision (5.30.25): One Lord, one faith, one baptism

 

Image: "Knockout" roses, North Garden, Virginia, May 2025.

Note: Devotion taken from last Sunday's sermon on Ephesians 4:1-6.

One Lord, one faith, one baptism (Ephesians 4:5).

In Ephesians 4:1-3 the apostle Paul describes several marks of those who are “walking worthy of the vocation” to which they were called. In other words, these are marks of those who profess to be Christians and who then conduct themselves as Christians. One of those marks is “endeavoring to keep the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace” (4:3).

In Ephesians 4:4-6 Paul stresses the importance of unity among believers. He then uses the term “one” no less than seven times to emphasize the ground for Christian unity. We have one body, one Spirit, one hope, one Lord, one faith, one baptism, and one God and Father of all.

Let me focus on three of those “one”s which are listed in quick order in v. 5:

As Christians we have one Lord. That is the Lord Jesus Christ. There are not many Saviors and many Lords but one Lord. As Peter preached in Jerusalem, “Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved” (Acts 4:12).

We have one faith. Here faith means not merely the personal trust in Christ, but one orthodox (right-believing) confession of faith. In Titus 1:4 Paul called Titus his own son, “after the common faith.” In Jude 3, that servant of Jesus Christ exhorted believers, “that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints.” Orthodox doctrine does not divide. It unites faithful Christians.

And there is one baptism. Not only was Paul saying that baptism, when rightly ordered, should happen just once in the believer’s life, but also that true baptism (by the Spirit and then by water) comes to those who hear the preaching of the gospel, repent of their sins and believe in Christ. The one baptism is that experienced by those who have been born again.

May the Lord grant us unity, upon the basis of these marks, within our particular local church and with believers around the world.

Grace and peace, Pastor Jeff Riddle

R. L. Dabney on those who delight in criticizing and amending "the received English version"

 

From X post:

R. L. Dabney warns against those who delight in criticizing and amending “the received English version” “this precious work of our ancestors”:

"The most reprehensible pedantry of all is that which delights in criticizing and amending the received English version. Instead of seeking for opportunities to point out errors in this precious work of our ancestors, its credit should be carefully sustained before the people, whenever this can be done without an actual sacrifice of our integrity and of the truth of the text. The general excellence of the translation merits this treatment. Such were the learning and labour of its authors, that he who is most deeply acquainted with sacred criticism will be found most modest in assailing their accuracy in any point. But it is far more important to remark, that this version is practically the Bible of the common people—the only one to which they can have familiar access. If their confidence in its fidelity is overthrown, they are virtually robbed of the written word of God…. Thus let the confidence of your hearers in their English Bibles be preserved and fortified."

-Evangelical Eloquence, 162-163.