Zanchi on Philippians 4:12 ("I know both how to be abased, and I know how to abound..."):
Stylos is the blog of Jeff Riddle, a Reformed Baptist Pastor in North Garden, Virginia. The title "Stylos" is the Greek word for pillar. In 1 Timothy 3:15 Paul urges his readers to consider "how thou oughtest to behave thyself in the house of God, which is the church of the living God, the pillar (stylos) and ground of the truth." Image (left side): Decorative urn with title for the book of Acts in Codex Alexandrinus.
Tuesday, May 05, 2026
Zanchi: "For our lives... is like a wheel...."
Friday, January 23, 2026
The Vision (1.23.26): When things "fall out" for the furtherance of the gospel
Note: Devotion taken from last Sunday's sermon on Philippians 1:12-18.
“But I would ye should understand,
brethren, that the things which happened unto me have fallen out rather unto
the furtherance of the gospel” (Philippians 1:12).
Paul writes his epistle to the
saints at Philippi while in bonds,
literally in chains. As now, such circumstances did not typically win friends and
influence people in that day. Paul had been slandered, attacked, beaten, and
imprisoned throughout his ministry as an apostle.
He had survived death by stoning at
Lystra (Acts 14:19-20). He fled Thessalonica “by night” after being threatened
(Acts 17:10). He was nearly torn limb from limb in the temple in Jerusalem as
the mob cried out, “This is the man,
that teacheth all men every where against the people, and the law, and this
place” (Acts 21:28). Forty Jews took a vow not to eat or drink till he was assassinated
(Acts 23:12-13). Transferred to Caesarea, a Jewish orator named Tertullus
accused him before the Roman governor Felix of being “a pestilent fellow, and a mover of sedition among
all the Jews throughout the world, and a ringleader of the sect of the
Nazarenes” (Acts 25:5). Appealing his case to Caesar, Paul was sent to Rome
under the guard of a Roman centurion named Julius (Acts 27:1). The ship was
wrecked in a storm, and Paul made it to shore clinging to the wreckage (27:44).
As the survivors built a fire, a poisonous snake came out from the wood pile
and bit the apostle on the hand. He shook the snake off into the fire and
miraculously persevered. Eventually he came to Rome and was kept a prisoner for
two years. In 2 Corinthians 11:23-28 Paul provides a list of many of the things
he had endured as an apostle.
When
Paul said in Galatians 6:17, “I bear in my body the marks of the Lord Jesus,”
he was not speaking metaphorically.
Paul’s
statement in Philippians 1:12 comes in the context of his “lived experience.”
He begins, “But I would ye should understand, brethren….” He wants them to
understand his circumstances with Christian discernment. He calls them his
brethren. They are together part of the family of God.
He
declares that the things which have “fallen out” (taken place in his life in
the providence of God; the verb means to loosen or unravel) for him have
transpired for the furtherance [advance] of the gospel [here: the proclamation
of the good news of what God has done for us in Christ].
As
I read this passage it took me back to Genesis 50:20: “ye thought evil against
me, but God meant it unto good.”
It
also recalls Paul’s great declaration in Romans 8:28, “And we know that all
things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called
according to his purpose.”
Just
as God had allowed Joseph’s suffering to save many from physical famine in Egypt,
God had allowed Paul’s suffering so that he might preach the gospel to many in
Rome and save them from spiritual famine. This included some in the Roman
palace (1:13) and even in “Caesar’s household” (4:22).
This
is the way believers look at their circumstances whether filled with “smiling”
or “frowning” providences. God is making things “fall out” for his own glory and
the good of his people, for the furtherance of the gospel.
Grace
and peace, Pastor Jeff Riddle
Friday, December 19, 2025
The Vision (12.19.25): God meant it unto good
Note: Vision devotional article taken from last Sunday's sermon on Genesis 50.
But as for you, ye thought evil against me; but God meant it unto
good, to bring to pass, as it is this day, to save much people alive (Genesis
50:20).
When Joseph’s brothers fall on their faces before him, afraid he will
take just vengeance upon them after the death of their father Jacob, Joseph
makes this most amazing and insightful statement. Perhaps one of the most
important and most meaningful and practical in all of Scripture. “Ye thought
evil against me; but God meant it unto good.”
This is the way the Lord operates. He allows the evil actions of
men. But he takes that evil, and, in his sovereignty, he makes it into good.
The Lord allowed Joseph’s brothers to strip him of his special coat, to cast him into a waterless
hole in the ground, and then to sell him into slavery. They thought evil
against him. But had this not happened Joseph never would have gone to Egypt,
and he never would have risen to the top and saved many nations, including his
own family, from starvation and annihilation during seven years of grievous famine.
The NT equivalent to Genesis 50:20 is Romans 8:28 “And we know that all things work together for
good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his
purpose.”
Joseph only learned this lesson through prayerful retrospection and
reflection. We also should meditate on Joseph’s statement. The
Puritan John Flavel wrote, “Sometimes providences, like Hebrew letters, must be
read backwards.” Look back over your life and consider those times when others
thought evil against you. God permitted it, but he always had a gracious
purpose. He meant it for his glory and for your good.
Grace and peace,
Pastor Jeff Riddle
Tuesday, September 06, 2022
Jots and Tittles 5: John Owen on Preservation, Satan's Craft, and "Missing Verses"
Introduction:
In this
episode I want to read a section on the divine providential preservation of Scripture
from John Owen’s work titled, “The Reason of Faith, Or, The Grounds Whereon the
Scripture is Believed to be the Word of God with Faith Divine and Supernatural”
(1677) (Works, 4:5-115).
This is part
of Owen’s larger study on the Holy Spirit.
I thought it
might be helpful to share this given some of the misunderstandings and even
outright misrepresentations of Confessional Bibliology that have recently been
appearing online.
Owen’s overall
thesis in this work is that the believer must come to receive Scripture as the
Word of God based on an internal compulsion founded upon the fact that Scripture
is divine revelation, rather than upon, what he calls “moral persuasion” based
on “external arguments.”
So, he
writes:
“The sum is,
We are obliged in a way of duty to believe the Scriptures to be divine revelation,
when they are ministerially or providentially proposed unto us…. The ground
whereupon we are to receive them is the authority and veracity of God speaking
in them; we believe them because they are the word of God” (49).
He adds:
“Wherefore,
we do not nor ought only to believe the Scripture as highly probable, or with
moral persuasion and assurance, built upon arguments absolutely fallible and
human… if we believe not with faith divine and supernatural, we believe not at
all” (49).
Nevertheless,
Owen holds that there is a place for “external arguments” reasonably to confirm
belief in Scripture as the Word of God.
In chapter 3
of “The Reason of Faith” Owen outlines five such “Sundry convincing external arguments
for divine revelation” (20-47). They include:
1. The antiquity of the writings;
2. The providential preservation of the
Scriptures;
3. The overall divine wisdom and
authority of the Scriptures;
4. The testimony of the church;
5. The doctrines derived from the Scriptures.
Owen on
Preservation:
I want now to
read Owen’s discussion of the preservation of Scripture as one of these five external
arguments :
[Reading from
Owen, Works, 4: 23-26]
Conclusion:
The Reformed
doctrine of the providential preservation of Scripture is one of the most
neglected themes in contemporary theology. I think Owen’s views add insight into what the framer’s of the WCF meant in 1:8 when they spoke of God’s Word having
been “kept pure in all ages.”
In recent
years there have been various evangelical and even Reformed attempts either to
reject this doctrine (See Dan Wallace) or to reinterpret it (See Richard Brash).
Confessional
Bibliology represents an effort neither to reject nor reinterpret but to
retrieve this doctrine. Sadly, lack of familiarity with and misunderstanding
of this historic doctrine has resulted, in part, in the unjust confusion and
conflation of Confessional Bibliology with IFB KJVO-ism (a phenomenon of the 20th
century).
Most
recently a Presbyterian youtuber has ungraciously mocked CB as KJVO because of
questions raised by us about “missing verses” in the modern critical text and
in modern translations, accusing us of promoting wacky conspiracy theories. He
has also suggested that the historic Christian position is to accept
uncertainty about what exactly the text of Scripture is, so that we have no reason
for anxiety when modern editors and translators remove passage from OR ADD to the
traditional text.
I think you
can clearly see in this excerpt from Owen, however, that he believed in the meticulous
care of God’s Word, as he puts it, “that not a letter of it should be utterly
lost.” He expresses his trust in divine providence to preserve “this book and
all that is in it, its words and its syllables.” He even speaks clearly of the
Scriptures having been preserved despite Satan’s efforts to corrupt it. He speaks
of Scripture having been preserved despite “the malicious craft of Satan.” He
notes that God’s providence even kept “apostatized Christians” from “the corrupting
of one line in it.”
I think we
can see that the beef some have with CB is really a beef with John Owen and the
Reformed Protestant Orthodox and, sadly enough, perhaps with WCF 1:8.
I hope that
this reading of Owen might help to clarify this point for those with sincere, serious,
and open-minded interest in this topic.
JTR
Thursday, April 07, 2022
John Owen (1616-1683) on Matthew 5:18: To reject the “meticulous” providential preservation of Scripture is not to believe in providence at all
“…yet, through the watchful care and providence of God, sometimes
putting itself forth in miraculous instances, it [Scripture] hath been
preserved unto this day, and shall be so to the consummation of all things. The
event of that which was spoken by our Saviour, Matt. v. 18, doth invincibly
prove the divine approbation of this book, as that doth its divine original, ‘Till
heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law.’
God’s perpetual care over the Scripture for so many ages, that not a letter of
it should be utterly lost, nothing that hath the least tendency toward its end should
perish, is evidence of his regard unto it."
“For my part, I cannot but judge that he that seeth not an hand
of divine Providence stretched out in the preservation of this book and all that
is in it, its words and syllables, for thousands of years, through all the overthrows
and deluges of calamities that have befallen the world, with the weakness of
the means whereby it hath been preserved, and the interest, in some ages, of
all those in whose power it was to have been corrupted,—with the open
opposition that hath been made unto it, doth not believe there is any such
thing as providence at all.”
-John Owen (The Reason of Faith, Works, 4, 24).
Wednesday, February 09, 2022
Monday, May 10, 2021
Didache 4:13: Implications for the preservation and transmission of the NT?
Didache 4:13 (M. W. Holmes trans.): "You must not forsake the Lord's commandments but must guard what you have received, neither adding nor subtracting anything [mēte prostitheis mēte aphairōn]."
Implications for early Christian views on the preservation and transmission of NT?







