Image: The tetragrammaton, the four consonant Hebrew term for God: Y-H-W-H.
Image: The Hebrew word "Adonai" with vowel points.
Image: The tetragrammaton with the vowel pointing for "Adonai" which apparently resulted in the transliterated English term "Jehovah" in early English Bible translations like the Geneva Bible and the KJV.
I was recently asked by
some students to explain: Where does the
name “Jehovah” come from? Here is an
answer:
The English word “Jehovah” appears four times independently
in the KJV of the Old Testament (Exod 6:3; Ps 83:18; Isa 12:2; 26:4). It also appears three other times as a
compound: Jehovahjireh (Gen 22:14; the
LORD will provide); Jehovahnissi (Exod
17:15; The LORD is my banner); and Jehovahshalom (Judges 6:24; The LORD is peace).
Side Note: The word “Jehovah”
also appears in the Geneva Bible at Exod 6:3; Ps. 83:18 (but not at Isa 12:2;
26:4) and as a compound at Gen 22:14; Exod 17:15; and Judges 6:24 [and perhaps
in other places in the Geneva Bible; I have not surveyed the entire]. I have also not yet taken time to survey whether
it appears in other early English Bible translations which predate the KJV, like
the Great Bible (1540) or the Bishop’s Bible (1568), but this seems likely. The evidence from the Geneva Bible alone
proves that “Jehovah” is not a unique rendering of the KJV.
In each instance “Jehovah” is a transcription/translation of
the tetragrammaton or four consonant special
name for God that frequently appears in the Old Testament. This divine
name is usually translated in the King James Version simply as “LORD” (“Lord”
in all capital letters). This is a very
helpful convention in that it informs the reader who does not know Hebrew when the
tetragrammaton is being used. It is in keeping with the translation
philosophy of the King James Version to use a variety of English words to
render the same underlying original language term (see “The Translators to the
Reader” in the Preface to the 1611 KJV which explains, “we have not tied
ourselves to a uniformity of phrasing, or to an identity of words”).
The ancient Hebrews had an aversion to pronouncing the name
of God and instead used the word adonai
(“Lord”). The term “Jehovah” apparently comes from the Hebrew consonants of the tetragrammaton
(J-H-V-H), along with the vowel markings for
adonai. Some modern translations
render the divine name as “Yahweh,” from the consonants from the tetragrammaton (Y-H-W-H) [preferring,
however, to use J for Y and V for W].
The term “Jehovah” has also come to be distinctively stressed
by the Jehovah’s Witnesses religion, a modern heterodox offshoot of
Christianity. The Jehovah’s Witness’ New World Translation (Revised in 2013)
selectively translates the Greek word kurios
(“Lord”) as “Jehovah” in various NT passages to fit their idiosyncratic
beliefs, including the denial of the divinity of Jesus (e.g., When Jesus is referred to as kurios by Thomas in John 20:28 the word is not translated as "Jehovah" but as "Lord"). In the King James Version and other orthodox
translations the English word “Jehovah” is never used in the New Testament, since it is a unique transliteration of the Hebrew name for God and the New Testament is written in Greek.
Some dictionary
entries:
The Harper’s Bible Dictionary (Harper, 1985)
entry for the word “tetragrammaton” explains:
The hybrid word “Jehovah” is a
combination of the vowels of “Adonai” with the consonants of the tetragrammaton….”
(p. 1036).
B. W. Anderson’s article on “Jehovah” in the Interpreter’s Dictionary of the Bible, Vol.
2 (Abingdon, 1962, 1990) offers the following definition:
An artificial form, often attributed to
Petrus Galatinus in ca. A. D. 1520, which results from the combination of the
consonants of the Tetragrammaton, “YHWH,” with the substitute vowel reading which
was introduced when the MT was fixed during the sixth-seventh centuries A.
D. The pre-Masoretic text was
consonantal, vowels being supplied by the reader from a knowledge of the
language. In the post-exilic period
(after 538 B. C.) the sacred name “Yahweh” was withdrawn from popular usage for
fear it would be profaned. Of the
various substitutes that were employed, the chief was “Adonai” (“Lord”), the
vowels of which the Masoretes as a rule added to the consonants “YHWH” to
indicate that “Adonai” should be read.
The combination of the two—the Tetragrammaton and the vowels of “Adonai”—yields
the artificial name which appeared in a few passages of the KJV and was
regularly used in the ASV. The RSV,
following ancient synagogue practice, renders, “The Lord” (p. 817).
JTR
6 comments:
Many scholars from the reformation and post reformation believed that the correct pronunciation of the sacred name was "Jehovah", and there are some that still uphold this position, like the karaite Jew Nehemia Gordon (http://www.karaite-korner.org/yhwh_2.pdf).
It is a interesting debate, but besides the pronunciation, I think it is the meaning and the understanding of the Sacred Name of our Lord is more important.
God bless!
Victor,
Thanks for the comment and the link to the article. Very interesting. I have to say that my antenna rises with almost anything that is a modern "scholarly" consensus. This is a good reminder that the "Adonai" vowel markings for the tetragrammaton is a theory, and it may be wrong. I did not read the Gordon article very closely but was struck by what I read of his observations on lack of qere-ketiv evidence for the "Adonai" vowel pronunciation.
I think it is highly likely that the denigration of "Jehovah" was part of the 19th-20th century war on the KJV (and the handling of its underlying traditional text). One part of the "Harper's Bible Dictionary" which I did not quote was this line: The word Jehovah's "appearance in the KJV was the result of the translators' ignorance of the Hebrew language and customs." Perhaps they were not as "ignorant" as the author of this entry believes. It is interesting that he picks on the KJV, in particular, though, as I note, the use of "Jehovah" was also in the Geneva Bible and probably others. Maybe they weren't as "ignorant" as some modern scholars might think. I wonder also how this is connected to the debate about the antiquity and transmission of the vowel points by Owen (vol. 16) and others.
Anyhow, thanks for the helpful comment.
JTR
John Gill, if I recall correctly, believed the vowel points were part of the inspired text tradition: http://books.google.com/books?id=59wOAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA429#v=onepage&q&f=false
Patrick,
I would assume this was Gill's view. It certainly was Owen's, as expressed in his article "A Vindication of the Purity and Integrity of the Hebrew and Greek Texts of the Old and New Testament" (in his Collected Works, Vol. 16). The antiquity of the vowel points was apparently challenged by the Jewish scholar Elias Levita in his book "Masoret ha-masoret" (1538). Catholics seized on this to argue against sola scriptura (i.e., mother church must tell you how to properly vocalize and interpret the OT). The antiquity of the points were defended by Johannes Buxtorf the elder, but in 1624 Louis Cappel, a Protestant, supposedly offered a "devastating refutation" of Buxtorf in his "Mystery of the Points Revealed" (English title for the Latin original). From then on, it seems, the scholarly consensus has been that the Hebrew vowel points were a later invention of the Masoretes. As noted, the "scholarly consensus" is often wrong or based second hand on the authority of "leading scholars" without firsthand examination. I'm continuing to look at it.
It is a myth that we get Yehovah by inserting the vowels of Adonai under the letters of the Tetragrammaton. The Talmud teaches the pronunciation of God's name is to be passed down every seven years. When you look at the vowel points of Adonai and the vowel points under the Tetragrammaton in the Hebrew Bible, you will quickly see they are not the same. So what are the vowels of God's name? The vowels of Le' Olam are the vowels that belong under the letters of the Tetragrammaton. This gives us Yehovah or Yehowah, depending on what tradition you prefer for how to pronounce the letter "vav".
The Hebraic poetry as evidence of the correct utterance of the Tetragrammaton
One of the strongest pieces of evidence of the correct pronunciation of the Tetragrammaton יְהוָֹה Yehovah can be found in the Hebraic poetry. We need to know that unlike the western poetry which heavily relies on rhyming at the end of verses, the Hebraic poetry uses a different type of rhymes called Hebrew puns.
This type of poetry can be best seen in Psa 122:6 which says in English:
Pray for the peace of Jerusalem: they shall prosper that love thee. (Psa 122:6 KJV)
But, in Hebrew it is written:
שַׁ֭אֲלוּ שְׁלֹ֣ום יְרוּשָׁלִָ֑ם יִ֝שְׁלָ֗יוּ אֹהֲבָֽיִךְ׃
And pronounced:
sha-alu sha-lom ye’ru-sha-layim ish-layu o’ha-vaych
With the exception of one word all other words sound like the word שׁל, shal, “to draw out” from which שׁאל, sha’al, “to ask, to pray” derives, and from which a close synonym of shalam, “to make complete” derives, too. And when the verse is read in Hebrew, the utterance shal is predominant and gives the specific Hebraic cantillation of the language.
Hence, we may say that when Hebraic poetry is used in connection with the Name, it comes to hint us of the correct pronunciation.
Now, let us find how the Tetragrammaton is used the Hebraic poetry in Eze 1:3. We read in Hebrew:
הָיֹ֣ה הָיָ֣ה דְבַר־֠יְהוָה
hay-oh hay-ah da-var Yehovah
There was surely the word of YHVH
This wording seems unnecessary; it could have been said and it came to pass which in Hebrew is וַיְהִ֥י and is a common expression of the same idea. But in Eze 1:3 the rhyming of two forms of the Hebrew verb hay-ah היה, hay-oh hay-ah, with Yehovah is very Hebraic and forms a beautiful pun.
This rhyming would not work with the so-called “yahweh” or any other utterance, but only with the true one, Yehovah.
Another evidence is found in Exo 9:3, where a similar rhyming appears:
יַד־יְהוָ֜ה הֹויָ֗ה
yad Yehovah hoy-ah
The hand of YHVH is
Again, this wording and rhyming seem unnecessary, but it is used for a purpose. It is obvious that the Creator has rhymed the verb hay-ah with His Name Yehovah. The word hoy-ah (feminine form) in Exo 9:3 rhymes with the masculine form of ha-vah, הוה.
But probably the most compelling evidence in Hebraic poetry can be found in the following verses of Isaiah and Revelation:
I am the First and I am the Last, besides Me there is no Elohim. (Isa 44:6)
Favor to you and peace from Him who is and who was and who is coming, (Rev 1:4)
I am the ‘Aleph’ and the ‘Tav’, Beginning and End,” says Yehovah who is and who was and who is to come, the Almighty. (Rev 1:8)
יְהוָֹה אַשֶׁר הַיָה וְהוֶֹה וְיָבוֹא
Yehovah ah-sher ha-yah v’ho-veh v’ya-vo
Yehovah who exists, and existed, and shall come
It is Yehovah Elohim who speaks of Himself through the Messiah to Yochanan the Apostle (see Rev 1:1). We cannot find a better Hebrew word play than this example.
Post a Comment