Showing posts with label Vision 2023. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Vision 2023. Show all posts

Friday, December 15, 2023

The Vision (12.15.23): And God remembered Noah

 


Note: Devotion taken from last Sunday's sermon on Genesis 8.

“And God remembered Noah….” (Genesis 8:1).

“And Noah builded an altar unto the LORD….” (Genesis 8:20).

Genesis 8 describes how the LORD both maintained Noah and those in the ark throughout the flood (vv. 1-14) and directed him after the flood (vv. 15-22).

The ark might well have served as Noah’s coffin (a large, three-story coffin, made of gopher wood!), but instead God made it his life-boat.

This chapter speaks to the preserving grace of God, beginning with the statement, “And God remembered Noah….” (v. 1). God did not leave Noah alone in the midst of the flood and its aftermath.

Near the end of the chapter, we have another statement of spiritual significance, noting the first recorded action of Noah when he departed from the ark, “And Noah builded an altar to the LORD….” (v. 20).

Noah did not first build a shelter, a business, a statehouse, a school, a hospital, or a library. But he first built an altar, a church, a chapel where he worshipped the God who had miraculously saved him.

Noah’s response to his salvation was indeed worship. That altar was a place of sacrifice. Every sacrifice in the Old Testament is a type of the once for all sacrifice that Christ will offer on the cross. That sacrifice was a sweet-smelling savor before the Father (v. 21).

God remembered Noah, and, we might say, that Noah remembered the LORD in worship. This is why we come to worship. All true worship is gratitude. He remembered us, and we remember him.

What did Christ say when he instituted the Lord’s Supper? “This do in remembrance of me” (Luke 22:19).

Let us then be worshippers of our God in spirit and in truth, offering to him the sacrifice of praise. Let us remember him, because he first remembered us.

Grace and peace, Pastor Jeff Riddle

Friday, August 18, 2023

The Vision (8.18.23): The Almost Persuaded Hearer

 

Image: Knock-out rose, North Garden, Virginia, August 2023.

Note: Devotion taken from last Sunday's sermon on Acts 26.

Then Agrippa said unto Paul, Almost thou persuadest me to be a Christian (Acts 26:28).

Paul began his apologetic sermon before the Jewish king Agrippa by saying “wherefore I beseech thee to hear me patiently” (Acts 26:3b). This is a plea with which every Christian preacher should begin his sermon.

Paul noted that before his Damascus Road conversion he too “thought with myself, that I ought to do many things contrary to the name of Jesus of Nazareth” (v. 9). He then preached to the king from Scripture that “Christ should suffer, and that he should be the first to rise from the dead, and that he should show light unto the people [his fellow Jews], and to the Gentiles” (v. 23).

The Roman governor Festus, however, interrupted “with a loud voice” (v. 24a), and said, “Paul thou art beside thyself; much learning doth make thee mad” (v. 24b).

We should note that Paul had used the same language of “madness” to describe his irrational hated of Christ and his followers while he was yet unconverted. He had been “exceedingly mad” against Christians (v. 11). To the Christian, his old life seems mad and his new life in Christ sane, but unbelievers will often see it the other way around.

Paul responds by saying, “I am not mad… but speak forth the words of truth and soberness” (v. 25).

Paul then turns again to the Jewish king Agrippa, appealing to his knowledge of these things (v. 26). Paul begins spiritually to examine the king, probing his conscience, “believest thou the prophets? I know that thou believest” (v. 27).

Agrippa’s response, however, is one of the saddest in Scripture, akin to the rich young ruler who went away “sorrowful” from Christ, “for he had great possessions” (Matthew 19:22).

Agrippa responds, “Almost thou persuadeth me to be a Christian” (v. 28). The term “Christian” had first been used at Antioch to describe the followers of the Lord Jesus (11:26).

Agrippa declares himself to be an almost persuaded hearer of the gospel.

Paul’s response in v. 29, in turn, is truly astounding. He declares that he wishes that not only Agrippa but all who heard him that day would become as he was, that is, indeed, a Christian, a follower of Christ, a believer in him, except for his chains.

The irony is that spiritually speaking, the prisoner was free, and his wardens were imprisoned.

There are, no doubt, some who regularly attend upon the preaching of the gospel who are still what we might call “almost persuaded hearers.” Let such ones not perpetuate the error of Agrippa, but let them, by grace, be sanctified by faith, repent of their sin, and turn to Christ, producing the works meet or fitting for repentance (cf. vv. 18, 20).

Grace and peace, Pastor Jeff Riddle

Friday, August 11, 2023

The Vision (8.11.23): Paul in Athens (Acts 17:16-34)


Image: Modern view of the Areopagus (Mar's Hill) in Athens, Greece, where Paul once preached.

Note: I am what is called a “manuscript preacher.” That is, I generally write out a complete manuscript for each sermon I preach, even if I do not always rigidly follow it. Last Sunday the sound recorder malfunctioned, and we did not get an audio recording of the sermon, so I decided to post my sermon manuscript in full.


Paul in Athens

Acts 17:16-34

CRBC August 6, 2023

“Now while Paul waited for them at Athens his spirit was stirred in him, when he saw the city wholly given to idolatry” (Acts 17:16).

A couple of Sundays ago we completed an extended series of sermons from beginning to ending of the Gospel of Matthew.

Soon we will begin another series through Genesis 1-11.

In the meantime, however, we have been looking at a few selections in the book of Acts.

It makes sense to look at Acts after working through Matthew, because Acts tells us about the growth and expansion of the church founded by Christ after the death, burial, resurrection, and ascension of the Lord Jesus. It was even written by Luke, the beloved physician, who also wrote the Gospel of Luke.

I’ve suggested that Christ’s words to the disciples just before he ascended in Acts 1:8 serve as a kind of outline for Acts, as we see the apostles and those associated with them becoming witnesses for Christ in Jerusalem, and Judea (Acts 2), in Samaria (Acts 8), and to “the uttermost part of the earth.”

In Acts 17 we have a description of the gospel of Christ going to one of those “uttermost” places, the ancient city of Athens in Greece.

The gospel is brought there by Paul (formerly Saul) on what we sometimes call his second of three missionary journeys.

Athens was a city of learning and intellectual life. Many of the great Greek philosophers had lived and taught in Athens, beginning about 300 years before the first advent of Christ (men like Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle).

Some of the men of Athens were brilliant thinkers who delighted in doing nothing else but seeking and discussing knowledge. Athens was also a very “religious” city, as were most of the ancient cities of Greece and Rome. Whatever their intellectual or religious life, Paul came to them with a simple message that applies to all men whatever their station in life. He spoke to them of Christ, of his resurrection from the dead, and of his coming again to judge the world in righteousness.

In Acts 17 we get to hear Luke’s account of Paul’s visit to this great city, so that we might consider how the Lord is being pleased to present before us in our times his gospel.

I.                   Exposition:

First: Paul’s arrival and his preliminary ministry in Athens (vv. 16-22):

We begin, “Now while Paul waited for them in Athens…” (v. 16).

Remember Paul is on his second missionary journey. He has earlier ministered in Philippi (ch. 16). Then he had moved on to Thessalonica where for “three sabbath days” he “reasoned with them out of the scriptures” (17:2). After a great uproar in that city (see 17:5-9), Paul had gone to Berea (v. 10), where his teaching was initially well received (vv. 11-12). But soon the same ones who had caused trouble at Thessalonica also came to Berea to stir up problems, so Silas and Timothy sent Paul ahead to Athens (see vv. 13-15).

So, Paul was supposed to be waiting quietly for Silas and Timothy. But Paul apparently could not sit still. Why? In v. 16 it says, “his spirit was stirred in him, when he saw the city wholly given to idolatry.”

As I said, Athens was little different than all the other Greek and Roman cities. They were polytheists. They worshipped many gods. As one wag has put it, “The ancient pagans never met a god they would not worship.” Paul, however, had been raised as a monotheistic Jews, believing in the one God Almighty and true God of the Bible, the great I am. He knew the first commandment: No gods before God. He knew the shema (Deut 6:4: “Hear, O Israel, the LORD our God is one LORD.”).

Being in Athens no doubt reminded Paul of the depths of lostness that was all around him, and, most importantly, it provoked in him a zeal for the honor of the one true God, of whom these men were ignorant.

I remember when we went to China to add my youngest son to our family. It was one of the first times I witnessed outright paganism as we visited a Buddhist shrine and saw people bowing down to idols! We even saw a mother teaching her small child how to bow to an idol! It was so striking, because I knew we would be “indoctrinating” our child in a very different manner.

Paul could not just sit still in Athens while he waited for his colleagues, so we read in v. 17 of his ministry in two places:

First, “he disputed [dialegomai, discussed or preached] in the synagogues with the Jews, and with the devout persons [this likely means Gentile proselytes or God-fearers, like the Ethiopian Eunuch or Cornelius the Centurion]…” (v. 17a). This was part of Paul’s modus operandi, his way of operating. He would start in the synagogue or Jewish places of prayer (cf. at Pisidian Antioch, 13:14; at Iconium, 14:1; at Philippi, 16:13; at Thessalonica and Berea, 17:1-2, 10).

Second, at Athens, however, he also went into the agora or marketplace, and there were those who met with him daily, and we can assume it likely that many if not most of these were pagan Gentiles (v. 17b). The gospel is moving further out.

In v. 18 Luke mentions Paul’s encounter with members of two different philosophical sects.

First, the Epicureans. These were the followers of Epicurus. They sought to find meaning and purpose in life by the pursuit of pleasure. The English word epicurean (the inclination to indulge in sensual pleasures) has come into our language from them. For the ancients it was wine, women, and song (or today: sex, drugs, and rock and roll). In its more sophisticated forms, however, it focused on intellectual pleasures. They believed that the blessed life was one without pain or fear. This led them to atheism. If there is no God (or gods) to fear their wrath, you will be happy. So they rejected God (or gods).

Second, Stoics. They followed a man named Zeno who had taught in a great lecture hall called the Stoa. They sought to find meaning and purpose in life by overcoming one’s passions. One must show complete mastery over all his emotions and actions and be indifferent to all outward circumstances. One famous Stoic philosopher was a slave named Epictetus, who was often depicted in art as having a crutch, because it was said that his master deliberately broke his leg to test his servants apathy, but Epictetus had such self-mastery that he never uttered a word or cry of pain.

These pagans did not understand Paul’s teaching. Some said, “What will this babbler [spermalogos: one who spits words like seed!] say?”

They thought he was promoting “some strange gods,” because he talked about Jesus and the resurrection.

This tells us Paul was preaching Christ and him crucified and raised (cf. 1 Cor 15:3-5), but these foolish pagans were so ignorant of the truth they thought he was talking of two gods (one named Jesus and the other named Anastasis or Resurrection).

Then in v. 19 we read that they took Paul, almost like a press gang, and compelled him to go to a place called the Areopagus (literally, the hill of Ares or Mars, the god of war, because in their mythology Ares had been tried there for a crime by the other gods), a rock-outcropping still visible today. In those times it was a place for debate or contention.

They wanted to know the “new doctrine” or new teaching [didache] that Paul was bringing (v. 19b).

In v. 20 they express further their curiosity about Paul’s teaching since it arrives as something “strange” to their ears. At first blush this might seem very commendable. They were a curious people. They wanted to learn. They were open-minded.

Luke makes clear, however, in v. 21 that not all of this was spiritually healthy. He says that the Athenians and the “strangers” (or foreigners) in Athens, “spent their time in nothing else, but either to tell, or to hear some new thing.”

This is the love for novelty. The love for the newest, the latest, the most recent. This spirit drives most things in academics. You don’t get a graduate degree for saying what everyone has already said or believed but by proposing something new.

I heard a missionary once say that an open mind is like an open mouth. If it never clamps down on nourishing food, it will starve the body to death.

Paul once described to Timothy some of the men who were resisting his ministry as being:

2 Timothy 3: Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth.

Now as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith.

When one first hears the gospel, it is right to take time to consider and to fully understand and to investigate. But there must come a time when one moves from hearing about the truth to receiving the truth by faith and believing in it.

Someone might read lots of books about fishing and learn about all kinds of aspects of fishing and great fishermen of the past, and various theories of fishing. But at some point, he has to move from learning about fishing to actually fishing!

Second: Paul’s preaching at Mar’s Hill (vv. 22-31):

It begins, “Then Paul stood in the midst of Mar’s hill…” (v. 22). This recalls Peter’s standing to preach at Pentecost in Acts 2:14: “But Peter, standing up with the eleven, lifted up his voice…” And it recalls Philip preaching to the Ethiopian (8:35: “Then Philip opened his mouth, and began at the same scripture and preached unto him Jesus.”).

This is yet another description and prescription of preaching as the revealed means that God is pleased to use to draw men to himself (cf. 1 Cor 1:21: “it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe”). It is a fallible and imperfect man—in this case, a man who had once hated Christ and persecuted his people—who now stands to speak of Christ and to commend him to others.

Here Paul addresses the pagan Athenians, “Ye men of Athens.” He is not speaking to Jews, as did Peter, or a God-fearer, as did Philip, but to outright pagans. And so this will to some degree (but not radically) affect his message.

He begins by noting his observations of their outward religiosity or “superstitiousness” (v. 22b). Some render this as, “I see that you are very religious.”

Paul will later write to his fellow Jews in Romans 10:2 that they had a zeal for God but without knowledge. This could certainly also be said of the Athenian pagans.

They had all the signs of religion, all the forms of religion, without any true knowledge of God.

Paul says in v. 23 that as he passed through the city he noticed their “devotions” and he says he found one idol that even had the inscription, “To the unknown god.” They were apparently trying to cover all their bases. We worship all the gods, but in case we forgot one of them or in case one had not yet fully revealed himself to them, we also worship him.

Paul then says, “Whom therefore ye ignorantly worship, him I declare unto you.” In other words, I am going to reveal to you, declare to you, this God that you kind-of, sort-of, know is there but cannot identify so that you might know and worship him with understanding.

Paul then offers what we might call a three-point sermon:

First point: God’s creation of the world (vv. 24-25):

Again, he is speaking to men who are complete pagans. Thus Paul begins with the most foundational thing he can. God made the world in the space of six days and all very good. God is other than creation (a rejection of pantheism). He is over creation. He is Lord of creation. We do not worship creation, but we worship the Creator.

So Paul begins, “God that made the earth…” (v.24). He closes by noting that this almighty and powerful creator God does not dwell in temples made with hands.

By first addressing God as Creator Paul is also demolishing the theology and practices of ancient paganism. They thought God could be domesticated and controlled by their actions in the temple. Give him offerings and he has to treat you right, and he is visible in an idol in the temple.

Paul declares, however, that the one true God is too great, too holy, too powerful, too massive ever to dwell in something as puny as a temple. The whole earth cannot contain his glory, much less a pipsqueak temple!

He adds that the one true God is not worshipped with men’s hands (v. 25). He does not need anything from anyone or anything, much less from us. This is what the theologians call the doctrine of aseity, the doctrine of the self-satisfaction and independence of God. He was not lonely when he made this world and all that is in it. He made it out of an overflow of his abundance, not from any need in him.

God does not depend upon his worshippers, but his worshippers depend, for all things, upon him.

Paul asserts God’s aseity, “seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things” (v. 25). We are only living today, drawing breath, because gives it to us, day by day, moment by moment. Every beat of our heart, every breath taken should remind us of how absolutely dependent we are upon him for all things.

Second Point: God made men of all nations to seek and know him (vv. 26-29):

Paul moves from creation in general to the special creation of man (humanity). There is something different about us. As it says of man in Psalm 8:

Psalm 8: For thou hast made him a little lower than the angels, and hast crowned him with glory and honour.

Thou madest him to have dominion over the works of thy hands; thou hast put all things under his feet:

Here Paul stresses that God made from one blood (from the blood of one man, the first man Adam and his wife Eve) all the nations (ethne) of men to dwell on the earth (v. 26). He adds that he has set out the habitations for each of these nations.

Furthermore, he has purposed that they should “seek the Lord, if haply the might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us” (v. 27).

The language of “feeling after” evokes the idea of searching in the dark or with the vision obstructed. Imagine playing a game in the dark and the person you are seeking is right there, but you cannot find him because you do not see him. Then the lights are turned on and there he is, not far from you the whole time.

To further his point in v. 28 Paul quotes two pagan philosophers or poets, as he calls them.

He begins, “For in him we live, and move, and have our being.” This is apparently from the Cretan writer Epimenides.

He then writes, “as certain of your poets have said, For we are also his offspring.” This apparently comes from a man named Aratus from Cilicia, Paul’s home province where Tarsus stood.

Here Paul is using secular philosophers, known to his audience, to convince them of Biblical ideas. Note he did not begin here. He began with Genesis, with creation. But now he says that there are some things even pagans intuitively know. There is a God, and our lives depend upon him. We come from him. He made us, and, in this sense, we are his offspring.

Later Paul will write:

Romans 2: 14 For when the Gentiles, which have not the law, do by nature the things contained in the law, these, having not the law, are a law unto themselves:

15 Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another;)

These citations would be examples of men feeling about in the dark, groping after God, even while not fully knowing or understanding him.

He adds that given we have even this rudimentary knowledge that we are the offspring, the creations of this almighty God we should know that he cannot be reduced to the idol or graven image made of gold or silver or stone “by man’s device” (v. 29). The second commandment is written on our hearts.

Third point: The full revelation has come in Christ who will one day judge the whole earth (vv. 30-31):

Paul begins by noting that “the times of ignorance” that his pagan audience has previously lived under with all their mistaken notions of who God is, where he dwells, and how he is to be served, God, in his mercy was willing to “wink at” (literally to hyper-orao, to overlook).

Now all things have changed with the coming of Christ. Now God commands (not requests) that all men every where (Jew and Gentile, universally) must repent (experience a change of mind and heart as they acknowledge sinful ignorance and turn unto God through Christ in faith).

Paul then moves on to judgement (v. 31). I think he does so to grasp the attention of his hearers. God has appointed a day to judge the world in righteous by Christ, the man whom he hath ordained. Christ will come again in glory, and all men will be evaluated based on how they have responded to Christ. Compare:

2 Corinthians 5:10 For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ; that every one may receive the things done in his body, according to that he hath done, whether it be good or bad.

Matthew 10: 32 Whosoever therefore shall confess me before men, him will I confess also before my Father which is in heaven.

33 But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father which is in heaven.

And God has assured men that this is the way all things will end by raising Christ from the dead.

So ends Paul’s three-point sermon in Athens.

Third: The Response to Paul’s Sermon (vv. 32-34):

Every time Christ is preached there is a response. It is either a response of faith and belief and trust in Christ, or it is a response of disregard, unbelief, and spurning of Christ.

Three responses are described here:

First, those who mocked when they heard of the resurrection (v. 32a);

Second, those not convinced but willing to hear more at another time (v. 32b).

At this Paul departed (v. 33).

But finally we hear of the response of faith (v. 34). Most notably a man named Dionysius the Areopagite (likely one much engaged previously in these philosophical conversations) and a woman named Damaris. Luke is careful throughout Acts to note how the gospel comes both to men and women, and he often provides representative examples of each in such pairs.

These were not all, for Luke adds, “but others with them.” Not all believe but some do. They include men and women. The vast number will not be known or remembered by men but they are known by God. See the Bluegrass Gospel song, “There’s a Record Book” which begins:

To be well known of men
I may not ever be
I'm sure my name will not
Go down in history
There'll be no marble plaque
To tell of my good deeds
Nor any great parades
To honor me

But there's a Record Book
My name is written in
It was recorded there
When I was born again
No one can blot it out
It's sealed for evermore
It's in that Book of Life
Kept by the Lord

II.                 Application:

We today stand at our own Mar’s Hill. Some have been always learning but never coming to a knowledge of the truth. Christ has been put before us. Only he can give true meaning and purpose to our existence. What we knew intuitively has been revealed to us and made known. God will one day judge us on how we have responded to Christ. Will we follow in the path of those who mock or those who trust Christ by faith?

JTR

Saturday, April 15, 2023

The Vision (4.14.23): The Meaning of the Cup

 


Note: Vision devotional article taken from last Sunday's sermon on Matthew 26:26-35.

For this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for many for the remission of sins (Matthew 26:28).

In the upper room, on the night Christ was betrayed, he instituted the Lord’s Supper, with its two elements of the bread and the cup (see Matthew 26:26-28).

We can take away at least four conclusions from Christ’s words regarding the cup:

First: The meaning of the cup. The cup was a spiritual figure of the blood of Christ that would be shed upon the cross.

Second: The consequence of the cup. It was by this shed blood of Christ that a new covenant (testament) would be made between God and man.

This new covenant was prophesied by the prophet in Jeremiah 31, “I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah… for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more” (vv. 31, 34).

Third: The extent of the cup. This new covenant would not be for all men without exception, but it would be for many men from all nations, tribes, and tongues. What is being indicated here is not universal redemption but what the old theologues called “particular redemption.” The old Reformed Baptists were called “Particular Baptists.”

Christ likewise affirmed in Mark 10:45 that he came “to give his life a ransom for many.”

Fourth: The benefit of the cup. The benefit is the remission or the forgiveness of sins. Christ teaches that we are not forgiven of our sin due to some outward actions by us. We are forgiven by the shed blood of Christ.

This is what Isaiah was talking about when he prophesied, “and with his stripes we are healed” (Isaiah 53:5).

This is what John the Baptist was speaking about when he saw Christ and said, “Behold the Lamb of God which taketh away the sin of the whole world” (John 1:29).

This is what the apostle Paul spoke of when he wrote that in Christ God set forth “a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past” (Romans 3:25; cf. Romans 5:8-9; Ephesians 2:13).

Some modern theologians have denounced the Biblical view of forgiveness by the shed blood of Christ as primitive, with one calling it “a slaughterhouse religion.” But this is what Christ and his apostles taught. Through his shed blood we have remission of sins.

As the old gospel song puts it, “What can wash away my sin? Nothing but the blood of Jesus. What can make me whole again? Nothing but the blood of Jesus. Oh precious is the flow, that makes me white as snow. No other fount I know. Nothing but the blood of Jesus.”

Grace and peace, Pastor Jeff Riddle

Saturday, March 04, 2023

The Vision (3.3.23): But of that day and hour knoweth no man

 

Note: Devotion taken from last Sunday's sermon on Matthew 24:36-51.

But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only (Matthew 24:36).

Watch therefore: for ye know not what hour your Lord doth come (Matthew 24:42).

In the Olivet Discourse, Christ told his disciples that the exact time (the day and the hour) of his coming is not known even by the angels of heaven (those glorious creatures who serve as his messengers and ministers), but by his Father alone.

In Acts 1, just before Christ ascended in a cloud, some disciples asked him when he would restore all things. Christ responded, “It is not for you to know the times or the seasons, which the Father hath put in his own power” (v. 7).

Such statements remind us that we should beware of and reject any prognosticators who pretend to predict when Christ will return in glory.

The Millerites (followers of William Miller) predicted Christ would come on October 22, 1844. They later referred to October 23, 1844 as “the great disappointment.”

In 1988 Edgar C. Whisenant, a former NASA engineer published a book titled 88 Reasons Why the Rapture Will Be in 1988. In it he predicted the “rapture” (the taking up of the saints of God before Christ’s coming) would take place sometime between September 11 and September 13, 1988. He reportedly said, “Only if the Bible is in error, am I wrong.” Of course, Mr. Whisenant, and not the Bible, was proven to be wrong.

Harold Camping of Family Radio first predicted the return of Christ would be on September 9, 1994. When that didn’t happen, he revised the prediction to September 29 and then October 2. He later predicted the return of Christ on May 21, 2011, and when that did not happen, he moved the date back to October 21, but again, it did not happen.

Spurgeon offered this comment on Matthew 24:36: "We need not therefore be troubled by idle prophecies of hair-brained fanatics, even if they claim to interpret the Scriptures; for what the angels do not know has not been revealed to them" (Commentary on Matthew, 373).

Our task is not to know when Christ will come but to be discovered as faithful and wise servants when he does come.

Grace and peace, Pastor Jeff Riddle