CRBC Reformation Weekend Field Trip to Tinkling Spring: October 29th

Field Trip:  A CRBC Reformation Weekend Family Field Trip Day is set for Friday, October 29 to the Tinkling Spring Presbyterian Church in Fishersville (exit off I-64).  This historic church was founded in 1740.  Its ministers and members played a significant role in the American Revolutionary War and in the Civil War.  R. L. Dabney was a past minister of the church, and he designed the church’s sanctuary.  The church has a professionally created, museum quality, historical display on the church’s history that includes information on the Protestant Reformation, American history, and Reformed worship.  We will meet at Tinkling Spring at 10:00 am, and then tour the historical display, church building, and cemetery.  Bring your own lunch and we will eat together on the church grounds after the tour.  Anyone is welcomed to join us.

JTR

Matthew Mead: 8 Kinds of Counterfeit Zeal

Matthew Mead’s The Almost Discovered Christian Discovered (first printed 1661; SDG ed., 1993) was written “that the formal, sleepy professor may be awakened and the close hypocrite discovered” (p. xv).

Along the way, Mead notes 8 kinds of “counterfeit zeal” (pp. 55-60):

1. There is a blind zeal, a zeal without knowledge.

This was the zeal Paul had while a Pharisee and persecuting the godly.

2. There is a partial zeal.

It is to be “fire-hot” in one thing but “key-cold” in another. Many are “first-table Christians” yet neglectful of the second. While “others are mindful of the second-table, but neglectful of the first.” “So where zeal reaches to every command of God alike, that is a sign of a sound constitution of the soul.”

3. There is a misplaced zeal fixed upon unsuitable and disproportionate objects.

This is “a superstitious zeal” usually found in unconverted men “in whom grace never was wrought.” This is the zeal Paul had for “the traditions of his fathers” before his conversion.

4. There is a selfish zeal that has a man’s own end for its motive.

“Jehu was very zealous, but it was not so much for God as for the kingdom.”

5. There is an outside zeal.

Such was the zeal of the scribes and Pharisees who “would not eat with unwashed hands, but yet would live in unseen sins.”

6. There is a forensic zeal that runs out upon others.

“Many are hot and high against the sins of others and yet cannot see the same in themselves.” “It is easy to see the faults in others and hard to see them in ourselves.” “This zeal is the true character of a hypocrite. His own garden is overrun with weeds while he is busy in looking over his neighbor’s pale.”

7. There is a sinful zeal.

This is “a zeal against zeal.” It is a “devilish zeal.” It is a zeal against godliness and truth.

8. There is a scripture-less zeal that is not butted and bound by the Word, but by some base and low end.

“Many a man’s zeal is greater then and there, when and where he has the least warrant from God. The true spirit of zeal is bound by the Scripture, for it is for God and the concerns of His glory. God has no glory from that zeal which has not Scripture warrant.”

JTR 

The Vision (10/28/10): Thoughts on Church Officers

This Sunday (October 31), we will be asking our members to nominate men for consideration for service in our body as church officers (Ruling Elder and Deacon). Members will be given a slip of paper and may nominate as many men as they wish for each office. The Pastor will review these nominations and hold interviews with those who receive a significant number of nominations to discuss calling, qualifications, and expectations. He will then nominate candidates for election by the congregation at our Annual Church Conference in January.

Here are some thoughts to consider for each office:

Ruling Elder:

A good summary of the qualifications appears in Paul’s instructions to Titus in Titus 1:5-9:

5 For this reason I left you in Crete, that you should set in order the things that are lacking, and appoint elders in every city as I commanded you -- 6 if a man is blameless, the husband of one wife, having faithful children not accused of dissipation or insubordination. 7 For a bishop must be blameless, as a steward of God, not self-willed, not quick-tempered, not given to wine, not violent, not greedy for money, 8 but hospitable, a lover of what is good, sober-minded, just, holy, self-controlled, 9 holding fast the faithful word as he has been taught, that he may be able, by sound doctrine, both to exhort and convict those who contradict.

Since the Ruling Elder will be serving in the government of the church, he must first be one who has an established and exemplary track record in ruling or governing his own household (see vv. 5-6). This includes his marriage relationship and his relationship with his children. This does not mean that his wife and children are merely outwardly submissive to him. Is it evident that he has led in his home with authority and love?

Next, he must have an established track record in personal and spiritual life management (see vv. 7-8). Does this man govern himself and make good stewardship of his gifts for the kingdom? Does he speak the truth in love? Will he work in harmony with the Minister, with his fellow Elders, and with the church body? Is he a lover of strangers (hospitable)? Is he “holy,” distinctly set apart for God’s service?

Finally, and most importantly, he must be one who has demonstrated a passion for the truth (v. 9). Does he hold fast the faithful word? Is he sound in doctrine and able to exhort and convict those who contradict it?

Deacon:

A good summary of the qualifications for Deacons appears in Paul’s words to Timothy in 1 Timothy 3:8-13:

8 Likewise deacons must be reverent, not double-tongued, not given to much wine, not greedy for money, 9 holding the mystery of the faith with a pure conscience. 10 But let these also first be tested; then let them serve as deacons, being found blameless. 11 Likewise their wives must be reverent, not slanderers, temperate, faithful in all things. 12 Let deacons be the husbands of one wife, ruling their children and their own houses well. 13 For those who have served well as deacons obtain for themselves a good standing and great boldness in the faith which is in Christ Jesus.

We see some parallels with the expectations for Ruling Elders:

He must be a man who has proven himself to be a good steward of his household (vv. 11-12). Will his wife complement his ministry? Has he managed his household well?

He must be a man who has shown good stewardship of his personal life (vv. 8, 10). Is he pious, reverent, and truthful? Note that Paul contends that a man first be “tested” before taking this office.

Finally, he must be doctrinally sound (v. 9). He must hold the mystery of the faith with a pure conscience. Notice that unlike the Elders there is no requirement that he be apt to teach. His primary role in the church is that of service (cf. the “seven men” in Acts 6:1-7).

Conclusion:

Having reviewed these qualifications, we might well say with Paul, “And who is sufficient for these things?” (2 Corinthians 2:16). Indeed, in one sense, no one is worthy to serve in these exalted roles. Again, we learn from Paul who would say of this call to the apostleship, “For I am the least of the apostles, who am not even worthy to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God” (1 Corinthians 15:9). Yet, Paul concluded, “I am what I am, and His grace toward me was not in vain” (v. 10). Indeed, Paul records that Jesus said to him, “My grace is sufficient for you, for My strength is made perfect in weakness” (2 Corinthians 12:9).

The standards are exalted, men are weak, but this only magnifies our utter dependence upon the Lord for all things, including the supply of officers to teach, lead, and serve his people.

Grace and peace, Pastor Jeff Riddle

Barcellos responds to Schreiner on Sabbath

Richard Barcellos--on the Midwestern Center for Baptist Studies blog--is posting a series of irenic critiques of Tom Schreiner's recent comments on the Sabbath (see my previous post).

Barcellos' first two responses can be read here and here.

JTR

Be a church and not a museum

Image:  Fort Sumter

Below is the introduction I used for the message I preached back on 10/17 for the Homecoming services at St. John’s Bethel BC in Moncks Corner:

Yesterday my family visited Fort Sumter in the Charleston harbor. As you likely well know, Fort Sumter is the site of the first shots fired in the American Civil War (or War Between the States). I learned yesterday that even after that war the fort remained a military installation for many years. In fact, it was fitted with anti-aircraft batteries during World War II to protest the city of Charleston from air attack.

Only in 1948 was the fort decommissioned and turned over from the War Department to the National Parks. Now, it is no longer a fort but only a museum and historical attraction.

Here is the lingering question today. Are you still a congregation that is an active outpost of the kingdom? Do not settle for being a religious heritage society, a museum. Be on the front lines, defending the faith, taking ground for your Commander and His noble cause.

Be a church and not a museum.

JTR

More Charleston Churches

Last post on our Chareston church visits from last week:

Image:  St. Philip's Episcopal Church

Images:  St. Philip's cemetery holds a signer of the Constiution (Charles Pinckney) and a signer of the Declaration of Independence (Edward Rutledge).

Image: Not far away is yet another Episcopal church with a massive spire:  St. Michael's.

Image:  Not to outdone by St. Philip's, St. Michael's cemetery has two signers of the Constitution (Charles Cotesworth Pinckney and John Rutledge)!

Image: Finally, the First (Scots) Presbyterian Church

Llew and the children were gracious (and patient) enough to let me visit all these edifices.  We were thinking of visiting the synagogue when we ran out of energy for the day.  Maybe next time.  The diversity and heritage of these houses of worship remind you that we are a nation of immigrants that thrives on religious liberty.

JTR

Small World

Leslie W. emailed me the other day to say that she had read an interesting post on the blog of a Christian homeschooling family in Scotland she has gotten to know online.  The post had commended David Murray's sermon on creation at the recent Keach Conference!

Here's the link:  http://homeschoolonthecroft.blogspot.com/2010/10/christ-in-creation.html

Leslie wrote:  "Can you believe it?  Now, is it a small world or what?  What a blessing to see the effects ... on a family across the ocean that we have learned to love through writing.  The LORD be praised!"

JTR

A Visit to First Baptist Church in Charleston

Image:  The front of the First Baptist Church in Charleston, SC.

Continuing our "church crawl" last Monday through the "Holy City," one of the highlights was visiting the First Baptist Church of Charleston which can claim to be the first Baptist church in the South.  It actually began under the leadership of William Screven in Kittery, Maine.  Screven and the congregation moved to South Carolina c. 1696 and acquired the plot of land on Church Street in 1699.  This congregation essentially became the mother church for all Baptist congregations in the South.

In 1751 Pastor Oliver Hart led the church to join with three other Baptist congregations in the colony in organizing the Charleston Baptist Association, the first such body in the South.  Richard Furman was the pastor from 1787-1825.  Later pastors included Basil Manly, Sr., H. A. Tupper, and James Petigru Boyce (founder of the Southern Baptist Seminary).

Side note:  We had a celebrity sighting just outside the church where we saw the actor Bill Murray (Charleston is one of his homes) waiting to pick up his child at a nearby private school. 

Image:  Sign outside the church building.

Image:  Cornerstone plaque.

Image:  Marker for the Richard Furman family vault just outside the side entrance to the sanctuary.

Image: A view of the stately sanctuary where the so-called "Charleston" tradition of Baptist worship(stately, reverent, Calvinistic) was born. 

A Visit to the French Protestant (Huguenot) Church in Charleston

Image:  Exterior of the French Protestant (Huguenot) Church in Charleston, SC.

Charleston, SC is called the "Holy City" due to the high concentration of historic churches in the downtown area.  Last Monday, we walked to about seven different church buildings all within roughly a mile's span.

One of my favorite sites was the French Protestant (Huguenot) Church on the corner of Queen and Church Streets.  In April of 1680 forty-five French Protestants who has escaped persecution in their homeland and immigrated to England came to Charleston. They soon founded their own church.  The current building was completed in 1845 and the church is now the only existing Huguenot congregation in America.

The congregation worshipped exclusively in French until 1828 when a seven member committee translated the Huguenot Liturgy into English.  They had to add a burial service to their litrugy since under French Catholic oppression  Protestants had to conduct their burial services at night and in silence.  The church closed and reopened several times in its history.  The current pastor (a former Southern Baptist) has served since 1982 and now services are primarily in English.  The church still holds one service in French each year in the spring (on a date near the anniversary of the Edict of Nantes, April 13, 1598).  They also hold a solemn service each year on or near October 18 to commemorate the revocation of the Edict of Nantes in 1685.  Our tour guide (an Englishman!) is a member who told us the church was still distinctly Calvinistic in theology.  He also said that they have a "collation" (covered dish meal) each Sunday following the morning service.  This proves they're Reformed!  The first song sung in each Lord's Day service is Psalm 68 in French, and the last hymn sung is "My Country 'Tis of Thee."

Sadly, the church has lost a good bit of its Protestant simplicity with an elaborate organ, memorial plaques, and chandeliers added in later years.  Here are some more pictures:

Image:  Plaque outside the church

Image:  Sanctuary

Image: The narthex holds this list of American Presidents of Huguenot descent.  A plaque inside the church notes George Washington's financial gifts to the congregation.

Image: Over the Entrance to the sanctuary:  "Seek ye the Lord, while he may be found"

Image:  And over the exit:  "Be ye doers of the word not hearers only"

     JTR

The Vision (10/21/10): The Importance of Regular Giving

Note: We are giving special focus to stewardship in the month of October. The following article is written by CRBC Treasurer Daniel Houseworth.

How many of us have heard genuine believers make the following or similar statements?

- “I am under no obligation to give to the church because the New Testament says that God only wants cheerful givers.”

- “It is legalistic to say that the Bible says I am to tithe. That is an Old Testament concept and you cannot find it in the New Testament.”

- “I do give to the church, but to me the church is not just the place where I worship on Sunday; instead I like to give to many different ministries.”

In contrast with these prevailing opinions, the apostle Paul, inspired by the Holy Spirit, wrote in 1 Corinthians 16:1-4, “[N]ow concerning the collection for the saints, as I have given orders to the churches of Galatia, so you must do also. On the first day of the week let each one of you lay something aside, storing up as he may prosper, that there be no collections when I come.” From this passage we can derive several principles –

• Paul himself clearly “ordered” a particular collection imparting the principle that giving is obligatory not optional.

• The collection took place on the first day of the week (Sunday) imparting the principle that giving is normally to be done when the church gathers for worship.

• The collected amount was laid aside as a believer “may prosper” imparting the principle that giving is to be proportional.

• The collection occurred over time imparting the principle that giving is to be done regularly.

In addition to these principles, I would suggest that Paul’s order was built on the foundational principle of regular giving, i.e. tithing, to the local church. Note that this particular collection was to be taken from a local congregation for use elsewhere. While physical depravity and need were constants during the Apostolic era (and remain so today in many parts of the world), abject poverty was not a virtue in and of itself. Paul would not seek to deprive any local body of its own financial needs. Instead he sought to admonish the church in Corinth (and us) regarding Biblical stewardship.

For application, I would encourage each of us to do the following:

1. Continue to tithe (or start tithing) to CRBC to meet the financial needs of the congregation. This applies to members as well as regular attendees because CRBC is where we gather as brothers and sisters in Christ on the first day of the week.

2. Regularly set aside an additional amount to give to the Mercy Fund. This will allow us to meet the needs of those within our own congregation and beyond just as the church in Corinth was doing to relive the famine stricken church in Jerusalem.

3. Consider regularly giving beyond the tithe to the CRBC general fund. Surely we who have Jesus Christ, “who has become a surety of a better covenant,” (Hebrews 7:22) can exceed the basic and enduring tithe requirement established under the old covenant.

As we give our tithes and offering, we should do so out of thankfulness for the glorious salvation we have in Christ, “giving thanks always for all things to God the Father in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ,” (Ephesians 5:20) for God indeed “loves a cheerful giver” (2 Corinthians 2:7b). What more could cheer a man’s heart than know that he is a sinner saved by the grace of God?

Daniel Houseworth

Charleston Trip Highlights

Image:  Sign outside St. John's Bethel BC in Moncks Corner, SC.

We just got back yesterday from a long weekend trip to the Charleston, SC area.  I preached Sunday morning at St. John's Bethel Baptist Church in Moncks Corner on the occasion of their 101st Anniversary.  I was converted under the preaching of the gospel and baptized in this church which my father served as pastor in the early 1970s.  It was great to see many old friends from the congregation and to have my family see the area where I spent a significant part of my childhood. 

Image:  My family poses outside the church after services.

Image:  Standing by the ferry "The Spirit of the Lowcountry" with the Ravenel Bridge spanning the Cooper River in the background.

On Saturday we took a trip into Charleston and rode the ferry out into the Charleston Harbor to visit Fort Sumpter where the first shots of the Civil War (aka WBTS) were fired.

Images:  Hannah and Lydia on the ferry ride to Fort Sumter.

Image:  Llew and the children outside Fort Sumter.

Image:  A canon inside the fort

Image:  Sunday afternoon we took a family walk though the Waterfront Park and the children enjoyed the fountain.

Image:  St. Philip's Episcopal Church, Charleston.

On Monday we took a walk through Charleston with stops at many of the churches (look for future posts), the market, Rainbow Row, the Battery, and the old slave market.

JTR

Fuller: "Churches Should Exhibit the Light of the Gospel"

I posted today another sermon by Andrew Fuller (1754-1815) titled Churches Should Exhibit the Light of the Gospel.  The date and occassion for this message is not given in Fuller's Collected Works.  It is obviously a pastoral installation message.  The text is Revelation 2:1, and Fuller does a masterful job of challenging pastor and people to shine the light of the gospel.

JTR

Schreiner: "Believers are not obligated to observe the Sabbath"?

Justin Taylor ran an excerpt yesterday from SBTS NT Professor Tom Schreiner's upcoming book, 40 Questions About Christians and Biblical Law that got a lot of feedback.  The excerpt was from question #37 "Is the Sabbath Still Required for Christians?"  Schreiner's conclusion:  "Believers are not obligated to observe the Sabbath."  The discussion seems to hit at the heart of the distinction between those, like Schreiner, who are neo-evangelical Calvinists (soteriological Calvinists) and those who are Reformed.  Perhaps it is the influence of dispensationalism that leads neo-evangelicals to disregard the abiding relevance of the fourth commandment (see John MacArthur's comments on the the fourth commandment in his Study Bible notes on Exodus 20).  The discussion also brings to mind D. G. Hart's disavowal of the label "evangelical" in his book Deconstructing Evangelicalism.

JTR

The Vision (10/14/10): Giving As a Means of Grace

Image:  Fellowship at the Keach Conference hosted at CRBC in September.

Note: We are giving special focus to stewardship in the month of October. The following article is written by CRBC Assistant Treasurer Brian Overstreet.

It's too easy to fall into a habit of giving because that is what we're supposed to do. I'll confess that I far too often write my check for tithe and do not really put much thought into it. In fact, I thought that I was doing pretty well by not being a reluctant or grudging giver. Let's consider, however, what the Word says, "...God loves a cheerful giver" (2 Corinthians 9:7). How can one in truth cheerfully give away his possessions? That's like rejoicing because you were counted worthy to suffer (Acts 5:41). It begins by knowing that our possessions are not really ours. Everything we have, even we ourselves, belong to God. We exist only by His generous and gracious provision. He is the sovereign Lord of all creation, and has purposefully positioned each one of us (no matter what one's circumstances may be) so that we can honor and glorify Him with our whole lives, with everything we say and do, and with everything he has given us.

Even if you are in difficult financial circumstances, rejoice in your giving. Jesus said of the widow who gave the two mites, "Assuredly, I say to you that this poor widow has put in more than all those who have given to the treasury” (Mark 12:43). We should never confuse the amount of giving with its value. If you have plenty, rejoice because the Lord has given you the opportunity to give much.

Here are a few suggestions for practical application:

• When you are paid, set aside your tithe before doing other spending (the principle of the "first fruit").

• On Saturday night, prepare your tithe and pray, thanking God that he has provided for you so abundantly that you are able to give back that amount.

• Think and pray about how the Lord will use your tithe for his kingdom work. This is something to really be excited about. God is actually using you to accomplish his kingdom work here on earth! If you meditate and pray in this way, the Lord will increase your love of giving. 2 Corinthians 9:8 goes on to say that "And God is able to make all grace abound toward you, that you, always having all sufficiency in all things, may have an abundance for every good work." Here scripture is telling us that if we have a heart that loves to give, He will provide the ability and the opportunity to do so.

I am not writing primarily to encourage you to increase your giving, although that would be great. However, I do believe that if we are more thankful for what God has given us, as well as more prayerful and cheerful in tithing, God will then increase both the ability and fruitfulness of our giving.

Brian Overstreet

"Let us fly lest the baths fall in"

Image:  Ruins of the ancient baths in Ephesus

From the conclusion to last Sunday’s message, A Profile of False Teachers (2 Peter 2:1-3):

There was a story told among the first Christians that is recorded by Eusebius in his history of the early church (Ecclesiastical History IV.XIV). The story goes that once the apostle John was in Ephesus, and he went into the public baths. But then a man named Cerenthus, a notorious heretic and false teacher, came into the same building, and John “sprang out of the baths without bathing calling out, ‘Let us fly lest the baths fall in, since Cerenthus, the enemy of the truth is within.’”

Help us, likewise, to flee from falsehood, as we flee toward Christ, the one who is perfect Truth.

JTR

The Directory for the Publick Worship of God; Part 16 of 16

Note:  This is the final article in this series through "The Directory for the Public Worship of God."  Past articles can be read under the label below.

Touching Days and Places for Publick Worship.

THERE is no day commanded in scripture to be kept holy under the gospel but the Lord's day, which is the Christian Sabbath.

Festival days, vulgarly called Holy-days, having no warrant in the word of God, are not to be continued.

Nevertheless, it is lawful and necessary, upon special emergent occasions, to separate a day or days for publick fasting or thanksgiving, as the several eminent and extraordinary dispensations of God's providence shall administer cause and opportunity to his people.

As no place is capable of any holiness, under pretence of whatsoever dedication or consecration; so neither is it subject to such pollution by any superstition formerly used, and now laid aside, as may render it unlawful or inconvenient for Christians to meet together therein for the publick worship of God. And therefore we hold it requisite, that the places of publick assembling for worship among us should be continued and employed to that use.

Comment and analysis:  This final installment commends the Lord’s Day as the only Christian “holiday.”  The Directory, thus, sees no place for Christmas, Easter, Pentecost, etc.  Or, for that matter, Mother’s Day, Father’s Day, Independence Day, (or even) Reformation Day, etc.  It also rejects superstition over the actual physical place of worship.

Interpretive difficulties in 2 Peter 2:1: "denying the Lord who bought them"

Again, in preaching the text 2 Peter 2:1-3 last Sunday, I spent some time dealing with Peter’s assertion that the false teachers were “denying the Lord who bought them” (v. 1).

What did Peter mean by this? There is a notorious interpretive difficulty in this verse. It is one that is often thrown in the face of Calvinists who believe both in the final perseverance of the saints and in particular redemption.

The verse presents at least two challenging questions:

First, does it teach that these false teachers were saved but they then lost their salvation? Does it teach that a believer can become an apostate?

Second, does it teach “universal redemption”? Does it teach that Christ potentially died for these false teachers and the only reason they were not saved was because they did not accept what Jesus had potentially done for them?

For the initial question, we examined the Scriptures’ plain teaching on the perseverance of the saints (cf. John 6:37-40; 10:27-29; Phil 1:6; 1 Peter 3:5; and Romans 8:33-39), while also acknowledging that the Bible teaches that there will be false professors (cf. Matt 7:21 and the parable of the soils in Matt 13:1-23). The conclusion: Using the principle of Scripture interpreting Scripture, we can only decide that Peter is not describing genuine believers in 2 Peter 2:1 but false professors. These are not men who lost their salvation, but men who never truly had it.

For the second question, we started by examining texts that teach particular redemption (cf. Mark 10:45; John 10:14-16; Acts 20:28; Eph 5:25), also noting that “universal redemption” presents some unseemly possibilities (e.g. that there are people in hell for whom Christ died on the cross).

Finally, we turned in summary to John Owen’s comments on this verse in his classic defense of particular redemption, The Death of Death in the Death of Christ (Banner reprint, 1959): pp. 250-252. When Owen examined this text he made the following observations:

a. The word for “Lord” here is not kurios, the name that believers give to Jesus, but despotes. This implies that these men knew Jesus to be powerful, but they did not know him as their “Lord.”

b. When Peter spoke of them being “redeemed” he might have been using that word in a way that did not imply salvation (even though he uses the verb agorazo which in the NT most often refers to salvation as redemption or ransom). The implication would be that these false teachers had benefited from knowing the teachings of Christ, perhaps by being removed from the legalism of the Jews or the paganism of the Gentiles, but they were not savingly redeemed by the blood of Christ. Schreiner accuses Owen of “special pleading” on this point (1, 2 Peter, Jude [Broadman & Holman, 2003]: p. 330).

c. Peter’s point here is that in the estimation of others they were believed to be saved. They seemed to be among the redeemed. But Owen concludes, they were in truth “saints in show—really wolves and hypocrites, of old ordained to condemnation.”

JTR

Textual Note on 2 Peter 2:2

There is a minor textual variation in 2 Peter 2:2 that caught my eye in preparation for preaching the text last Sunday. The variation is largely without comment in modern critical Greek text apparati, and it is unmentioned in the marginal textual notes of the NKJV.

The issue:

The Textus Receptus reads: “And many will follow their destructive ways [tais apoleiais].”

While the modern critical text reads: “Many will follow their shameful ways [tais aselgeiais].”

The issue is whether the noun should be “destruction [apoleia]” or “sensuality [aselgeia].”

External evidence: This is one of those more rare instances where the TR reading departs from the Majority Text which also reads aselgeia. The Hodges/Farstad The Greek New Testament According to the Majority Text is one of the few current Greek texts to even mention the variation in its apparatus. The AV rendering of the phrase raises a question as to which text was before the 1611 translators. They rendered it: “And many shall follow their pernicious ways.” By “pernicious” did they mean “destructive” or “sensual”? A marginal note in some editions of the AV assumes it follows the TR, adding, “Or, lascivious ways, as some copies read.” It is more clear that the Geneva Bible followed the TR here, as it reads, “And many shall follow their destructions.”

Internal evidence: The strongest argument for the TR reading might be the repeated use of the word “destruction” throughout the text (cf. in v. 1: references to “destructive heresies” and “swift destruction,” and in v. 3 “their destruction does not slumber”). On the other hand, some would claim the possibility of assimilation. It might also be argued that here in the beginning Peter places the focus on the doctrinal errors of the false teachers and only later on their ethical errors (cf. 2:12-17). Thus, aselgeia would be out of place in v. 2. It might, of course, be countered that it would be proper to appear here given what will follow in vv. 12-17.

Conclusion: The evidence is inconclusive and worth further study.

JTR

Sermon of the Week: Andrew Fuller on "Advantages of Early Piety" (An 18th century Youth Sermon)

I posted another reading of a sermon by Andrew Fuller (1754-1815) today to sermonaudio.  This one is titled, Advantages of Early Piety (Psalm 90:14).  I gave it the subtitle, "An 18th Century Youth Sermon").  Indeed, Fuller apparently gave this message on what appears to be an annual gathering of the church's young people.  In the message Fuller offers a powerful evangelistic plea.  At one point, he reminds the youth that five of the past six funerals he had done in the church had been of those 20 years and younger.  He then takes on the voice of those who have passed and speaks "from the grave" pleading with the living to trust Christ in the flower of their youth.  We rarely hear a message like this at a contemporary "Youth Conference."

JTR

Four Principles for Scripture Interpretation

In preaching Sunday on 2 Peter 2:1-3, I spent a good bit of time on the interpretation of Peter’s mention that the false teachers were “denying the Lord who bought them” (v. 1). In so doing, I mentioned four principles of Scripture interpretation:

First, we never base our theology on a single text taken out of context.

Second, we allow Scripture to interpret Scripture. We interpret Scripture by comparing Scripture with Scripture.

Third, we interpret Scriptures that are less clear in their meaning by Scriptures that are clearer in their meaning. We understand passages in the shade by comparing them with those in the light.

And fourth, we always assume that the Scriptures are in perfect harmony and not in conflict with one another. What we see as differences are only apparent differences. The Scriptures are clear (perspicuous), though our ability to understand them is often clouded by sin.

JTR