tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19219922.post7898284151810077905..comments2024-03-03T21:51:46.662-05:00Comments on stylos: "Why I Prefer the NASB over the KJV": Review: Part 4: Quality of ManuscriptsJeffrey T. Riddlehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16374856944409335186noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19219922.post-33668420901284676822015-04-02T08:38:13.450-04:002015-04-02T08:38:13.450-04:00Thank you for your comments and for the informatio...Thank you for your comments and for the information presented here. I have found that many who promote the Critical Text of the New Testament confuse Old and New Testament issues. They also tend to make wild assumptions, either of their own making or some other teaching they heard. It is amazing what is still promoted out there. One that comes to mind is the story that Bruce Metzger told about the addition of 1 John 5:7. He claimed that Erasmus had a scribe named Roy or Froy to make up the text so that he could add it to his Greek text. If this were true, it would have many alarming implications concerning Erasmus and our New Testament. However, Erasmusian Scholars have debunked that Urban Legend as utterly false. Nevertheless, Dan Wallace, and James White still go around telling that story. I appreciate your honesty and willingness to present "all" of the facts, even the ones that aren't favorable to our position concerning the New Testament. Phil Brownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02752045605704569789noreply@blogger.com