tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19219922.post6745552964966543670..comments2024-03-03T21:51:46.662-05:00Comments on stylos: WM 106: Plummer on the KJVJeffrey T. Riddlehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16374856944409335186noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19219922.post-59361462578003296332018-12-11T14:51:11.102-05:002018-12-11T14:51:11.102-05:00Thanks for the input Phil!Thanks for the input Phil!Jeffrey T. Riddlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16374856944409335186noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19219922.post-31958923962366104632018-11-04T15:08:46.877-05:002018-11-04T15:08:46.877-05:00In Bruce Metzger's Book titled: "The Tex...In Bruce Metzger's Book titled: "The Text of The New Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption, and Restoration (4th edition)" Dr Metzger surprisingly stated the following on page 291 at the bottom, footnote #2. It says<br /><br />"What is said on p. 101 above about Erasmus' promise to include the Comma Johanneum if one Greek manuscript were found that contained it, and his subsequent suspicion that MS. 61 was written expressly to force him to do so, needs to be corrected in light of the research of H. J. de Jonge, a specialist in Erasmian studies who finds no explicit evidence that supports this frequently made assertion; see his Erasmus and The Comma Johanneum', Epemerides Theologicae Lovanienses, lvi (1980), pp. 381-9."<br /><br />The research that Dr Metzger was referring to can be found at the following link. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/15589157.pdf<br /><br />Phil Brownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02752045605704569789noreply@blogger.com