tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19219922.post530834616142775024..comments2024-03-03T21:51:46.662-05:00Comments on stylos: WM # 79: Topics on Text and Translation: Preservation; the Comma Johanneum; the ESV and ESS; and the new EHV translationJeffrey T. Riddlehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16374856944409335186noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19219922.post-72741104041999854742018-02-02T14:20:52.406-05:002018-02-02T14:20:52.406-05:00James, thanks for your comment. As you see above, ...James, thanks for your comment. As you see above, VLB also recommended your article. I will try to get to it eventually. As noted, I understand that the CJ is among the more difficult TR readings to defend, but I still uphold it as part of the confessional text. Though I have not yet read your article, I'd assume that any theory of its originations from Latin would necessarily have to be speculative. Still, I do not want to pre-judge your thesis before reading it. I've appreciated much of your work and glad we can at least agree on defending those places where the Byzantine and TR overlap over against our CT friends.Jeffrey T. Riddlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16374856944409335186noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19219922.post-69198460588858535382018-02-02T04:01:54.654-05:002018-02-02T04:01:54.654-05:00Jeff,
Please consider not only the most recent CJ...Jeff, <br />Please consider not only the most recent CJ-related but also the earlier ones. I basically offer a cumulative case that the Cj originated in Latin as an interpretive note about a form of the Latin text in which the witnesses were transposed.James Snapp Jrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09493891380752272603noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19219922.post-38782973143889935122017-08-14T03:32:50.921-04:002017-08-14T03:32:50.921-04:00Noah, thanks for the comment. I did read Harris...Noah, thanks for the comment. I did read Harris' book on preservation after I think you (or someone else) mentioned it. It does offer some interesting challenges to the TR on philosophical grounds. I will do an analysis/reply at some point. Enjoying time now in Lviv Ukraine. Beautiful city!Jeffrey T. Riddlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16374856944409335186noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19219922.post-39492140321267384532017-08-14T03:27:46.908-04:002017-08-14T03:27:46.908-04:00Victor, thanks for the comment. I realize the CJ i...Victor, thanks for the comment. I realize the CJ is difficult to defend but, as I understand it for now, I still uphold it. I will look at Snapp's article.<br />Jeffrey T. Riddlehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16374856944409335186noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19219922.post-9809620978385532702017-08-12T20:42:45.919-04:002017-08-12T20:42:45.919-04:00Since you take audience submissions, I thought I&#...Since you take audience submissions, I thought I'd ask: Have you ever interacted with Jason Harris's book <i>The Doctrine of Scripture: As It Relates to the Transmission and Preservation of the Text</i>? I found it quite helpful.Noahnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19219922.post-26371913529373089492017-08-12T11:21:50.586-04:002017-08-12T11:21:50.586-04:00Hi Jeff! Very good and interesting subjects on the...Hi Jeff! Very good and interesting subjects on the table this time! <br /><br />Concerning the CJ, James Snapp recently wrote an article about the verse and, even withou the commom "Erasmus Myths", he also upholds that the text of 1 Joh n in the lati copies camme from sort kind of an interpretation! (followed by more a comment from Maurice Robinson). <br /><br />In fact, there are a lot of pressupositions concerning the CJ than ever.<br /><br />God bless!Victor Leonardo Barbosahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17375083645018833817noreply@blogger.com