tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19219922.post3084398930396531960..comments2024-03-03T21:51:46.662-05:00Comments on stylos: Word Magazine # 26: Rejoinder to James White: Erasmus and ApologeticsJeffrey T. Riddlehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16374856944409335186noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19219922.post-30778058466654975952020-01-15T11:59:21.889-05:002020-01-15T11:59:21.889-05:00Keep going. Very helpful posts and messages. God b...Keep going. Very helpful posts and messages. God bless from WalesAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00526548918419130610noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19219922.post-72624163914301491392014-09-03T15:58:40.956-04:002014-09-03T15:58:40.956-04:00Pastor Jeff,
I admire your scholarly treatment of...Pastor Jeff,<br /><br />I admire your scholarly treatment of the subject rather than engaging in the rhetoric that these types of disagreements can so easily lead to.<br /><br />I still wonder what Dr. White, and those that hold a similar opinion, think of the reformers, puritans, and the framers of the 1689 2nd LBC (not to mention the church fathers), that boldly cite the CJ and wrote and preached on passages that the CT does not support. I suppose he must think them uninformed to treat such passages as inspired Scripture.<br /><br />Shame on them, or maybe it's shame on Dr. White for perpetuating the ploy of modern scholarship to bring into question the veracity and dependability of our Bibles today. Either way, I found your "Modern Text Only-ism" aptly comical.<br /><br />God Bless from Texas!AJhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18199858509918497666noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19219922.post-41312567314733459292014-09-03T13:34:55.138-04:002014-09-03T13:34:55.138-04:00Important post pastor Jeff!
The apocryphal story ...Important post pastor Jeff!<br /><br />The apocryphal story about Erasmus and the CJ is widely spread trough christian academy and in many books, unfortunately.<br /><br />Concerning Rev 16.5 I prefer to follow the reading found in Stephanus TR instead of the Beza's Text. But I largely disagree with White's argumentation (as you pointed rightly, also the CT advocates argue with some Conjectural emendation, what makes White's argument inconsistent).<br /><br />Would be very helpful a book written by a reformed view in defense the Traditional text, which is distinct of the fundamentalist view of the TR (that is inclined to uphold only the Scrivener Text as the Maximum standard and doesn't see the TR as the the group of printed texts that follow the early editions of Erasmus).<br /><br />May God Blees you!Victor Leonardo Barbosahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17375083645018833817noreply@blogger.com